netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: use seqcount to avoid lock in most cases
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:25:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170726112507.GA2217@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170726111506.GA1816@salvia>

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:15:06PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:09:41AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -144,7 +159,9 @@ static int nft_rbtree_insert(const struct net *net, const struct nft_set *set,
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	write_lock_bh(&priv->lock);
> > +	write_seqcount_begin(&priv->count);
> >  	err = __nft_rbtree_insert(net, set, rbe, ext);
> > +	write_seqcount_end(&priv->count);
> >  	write_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
> >  
> >  	return err;
> > @@ -158,7 +175,9 @@ static void nft_rbtree_remove(const struct net *net,
> >  	struct nft_rbtree_elem *rbe = elem->priv;
> >  
> >  	write_lock_bh(&priv->lock);
> 
> Do we need the spinlock anymore? This is protected by mutex from
> userspace, and we have no support for neither timeouts nor dynamic set
> population from packet path yet.

Forget this, I overlook we have a slow path in case seq mismatches.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-26 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26  0:09 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: use seqcount to avoid lock in most cases Florian Westphal
2017-07-26 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-07-26 11:04   ` Florian Westphal
2017-07-26 11:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-07-26 11:25   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170726112507.GA2217@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).