From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] constify nf_hook_ops structures Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:44:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20170729084429.GE28392@breakpoint.cc> References: <1501310455-7896-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, bhumirks@gmail.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Julia Lawall Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:43834 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753401AbdG2Iqk (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2017 04:46:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1501310455-7896-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Julia Lawall wrote: > The nf_hook_ops structure is only passed as the second argument to > nf_register_net_hook or nf_unregister_net_hook, both of which are > declared as const. Thus the nf_hook_ops structure itself can be > const. Right, also see http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/793767/ This series misses most of them (all arrays perhaps)?