From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [nft PATCH v2] echo: Fix for added delays in rule updates
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:59:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815115912.4254-1-phil@nwl.cc> (raw)
The added cache update upon every command dealing with rules was a
bummer. Instead, perform the needed cache update only if echo option was
set.
Initially, I tried to perform the cache update from within
netlink_echo_callback(), but that turned into a mess since the shared
socket between cache_init() and mnl_batch_talk() would receive
unexpected new input. So instead update the cache from do_command_add(),
netlink_replace_rule_batch() and do_comand_insert() so it completes
before mnl_batch_talk() starts listening.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
---
Changes since v1:
- Don't change function signatures: It is not really required and should
be done in a dedicated patch instead.
- Use 'ret' as return code variable name.
---
src/evaluate.c | 9 ---------
src/netlink.c | 11 ++++++++++-
src/rule.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 64e14b8ba8d98..0fad0913488d0 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -2965,10 +2965,6 @@ static int cmd_evaluate_add(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd)
handle_merge(&cmd->set->handle, &cmd->handle);
return set_evaluate(ctx, cmd->set);
case CMD_OBJ_RULE:
- ret = cache_update(ctx->nf_sock, ctx->cache, cmd->op,
- ctx->msgs);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
handle_merge(&cmd->rule->handle, &cmd->handle);
return rule_evaluate(ctx, cmd->rule);
case CMD_OBJ_CHAIN:
@@ -2983,11 +2979,6 @@ static int cmd_evaluate_add(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd)
case CMD_OBJ_COUNTER:
case CMD_OBJ_QUOTA:
case CMD_OBJ_CT_HELPER:
- ret = cache_update(ctx->nf_sock, ctx->cache, cmd->op,
- ctx->msgs);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
return 0;
default:
BUG("invalid command object type %u\n", cmd->obj);
diff --git a/src/netlink.c b/src/netlink.c
index f631c26b2b9ca..68f336255fc50 100644
--- a/src/netlink.c
+++ b/src/netlink.c
@@ -464,7 +464,16 @@ int netlink_replace_rule_batch(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, const struct handle *h,
const struct location *loc)
{
struct nftnl_rule *nlr;
- int err, flags = ctx->octx->echo ? NLM_F_ECHO : 0;
+ int err, flags = 0;
+
+ if (ctx->octx->echo) {
+ err = cache_update(ctx->nf_sock, ctx->cache,
+ CMD_INVALID, ctx->msgs);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ flags |= NLM_F_ECHO;
+ }
nlr = alloc_nftnl_rule(&rule->handle);
netlink_linearize_rule(ctx, nlr, rule);
diff --git a/src/rule.c b/src/rule.c
index 1bd5c80158b7b..38cd648eb24a8 100644
--- a/src/rule.c
+++ b/src/rule.c
@@ -1017,8 +1017,16 @@ static int do_command_add(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd, bool excl)
{
uint32_t flags = excl ? NLM_F_EXCL : 0;
- if (ctx->octx->echo)
+ if (ctx->octx->echo) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cache_update(ctx->nf_sock, ctx->cache,
+ cmd->obj, ctx->msgs);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
flags |= NLM_F_ECHO;
+ }
switch (cmd->obj) {
case CMD_OBJ_TABLE:
@@ -1058,7 +1066,18 @@ static int do_command_replace(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd)
static int do_command_insert(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd)
{
- uint32_t flags = ctx->octx->echo ? NLM_F_ECHO : 0;
+ uint32_t flags = 0;
+
+ if (ctx->octx->echo) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cache_update(ctx->nf_sock, ctx->cache,
+ cmd->obj, ctx->msgs);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ flags |= NLM_F_ECHO;
+ }
switch (cmd->obj) {
case CMD_OBJ_RULE:
--
2.13.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 11:59 Phil Sutter [this message]
2017-08-15 12:03 ` [nft PATCH v2] echo: Fix for added delays in rule updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170815115912.4254-1-phil@nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).