From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Sutter Subject: Re: [nft PATCH 0/2] First attempt at synopsis fixup Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:37:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20170817173725.GE10864@orbyte.nwl.cc> References: <20170817133900.21946-1-phil@nwl.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc ([151.80.46.58]:51405 "EHLO mail.nwl.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752664AbdHQRh0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:37:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170817133900.21946-1-phil@nwl.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > The first patch is to be considered a fix and optimization, the second > one is rather experimental and I would like to hear your thoughts about > it (some details as to why I'm not happy with it can be found below it's > commit message). Since I assume nobody likes to apply the patches individually and compile the sources just to see the difference in man page output, here are two screen shots: After first patch (only font style fix): http://nwl.cc/~n0-1/nft.8_style_fix.png (No idea how one could add hints for better spots to break long lines.) After the second one (with added indirections): http://nwl.cc/~n0-1/nft.8_indirection.png Cheers, Phil