From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Subject: Re: NFQUEUE --queue-balance Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 11:11:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20170827081123.GA22938@legohost> References: <20170826154013.GA19754@legohost> <20170826192421.GC29355@breakpoint.cc> Reply-To: Oleg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from forward102p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.102]:36968 "EHLO forward102p.mail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750797AbdH0IQJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2017 04:16:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170826192421.GC29355@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 09:24:21PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Oleg wrote: > > Hi, all. > > > > --queue-balance balance packets according to connection tracking, > > iiuc. Consequently queue utilization is not equal. E.g.: > > It hashes based on ip addresses. Thank you for clarification. > > Is there queue balancer without this feature(simple round-robin)? > > Use nftables or use multiple NFQUEUE rules with -m statistic. Wow! This what i need. Thank you! -- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)