netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	Netfilter Development Mailing list
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH RFC] Convert man page source to asciidoc
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:34:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906113402.GA19026@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOkSjBhAxw8KxyQrBbCfBE9kQb--4HY39Qoi0jvf-ybwc1y=8Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arturo,

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:56:37AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 10:41, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> > Beware: The conversion is incomplete and merely serves as base for
> > discussion.
> >
> > This patch converts nft.xml into asciidoc markup, top down until (and
> > including) stateful objects description. I stopped there because it's
> > the first chance of demonstrating my idea of splitting the documentation
> > into smaller pieces for convenience and maintainability.
> >
> > Regarding package dependencies, this "just" exchanges docbook with
> > asciidoc - dblatex is still required for PDF creation.
> >
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> thanks for your initiative and hard work, it's really appreciated :-)
> 
> Regarding the change, why asciidoc? why not markdown, or org-mode or
> reStructuredText?
> There are many markup languages, it reminds me to xkcd #927 [0].
> I would prefer if we stick to groff, which seems to be the standard in Linux.

Not willing to create a large thread debating what markup language
choice is better here, but I think asciidoc is a reasonable option.

> Regarding the separation of text in different includes, why not
> creating different manpages?
> Netfilter did this in the past with iptables(8) and iptables-extensions(8).
> 
> Brainstorming:
> * nft(8) <-- main document, general info
> * nft-ct(8) <-- concrete info for ct objects
> * nft-counter(8) <-- concrete info for counter objets
> * nft-flowtables(8) <-- about flow tables
> * nft-quota(8) <--- concrete info for quotas
> * nft-performance(8) <--- concrete info about nftables sets, maps,
> dicts, concatenations, etc.
> * nft-ha(8) <--- for HA environments, loadbalancing etc

Splitting manpage is a sensible option if we consider it's getting too
large, we can do this in incremental steps after the conversion.

Cheers.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-06  8:41 [nft PATCH RFC] Convert man page source to asciidoc Phil Sutter
2017-09-06  9:56 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2017-09-06 11:34   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-09-06 11:53   ` Jan Engelhardt
2017-09-06 11:58   ` Phil Sutter
2017-09-06 13:25     ` Jan Engelhardt
2017-09-06 14:02       ` Phil Sutter
2017-09-06 14:29         ` Jan Engelhardt
2017-09-08  8:53           ` Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170906113402.GA19026@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=arturo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).