netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH v2 2/2] src: get rid of printf
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:21:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921162108.GY30364@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921155112.GA27800@salvia>

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:51:12PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:43:09PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> > > With the proposed implementation of nft_print(), this will be
> > > problematic: nft_run_cmd_from_buffer() waits for the command to finish
> > > before printing all the output at once. This obviously breaks monitor
> > > which runs endlessly.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should reference nft_print via a function pointer in
> > > output_ctx? This would allow to configure a different nft_print
> > > implementation which flushes the buffer to stdout immediately.
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > I wondered the same thing.
> > 
> > I have following issue: When using new typeof keyword then listing
> > a set definition should output something like
> > 
> > set foo { type typeof(meta iifname) }
> > 
> > Because the kernel has no notion of 'meta iifname', we have to
> > store this information in the kernel so we can read it back during
> > delinearization.
> > 
> > One way to do this would be to store the 'meta iifname' string in the
> > sets userdata.
> > 
> > For that, expr_print() would have to be able to print to a buffer
> > (or we would need an expr_snprintf or something similar) to extract
> > the convert struct *expr back to its original name.
> > 
> > The other solution would be to stash this in the expression
> > during parsing but that seems weird as we need to be able to do such
> > conversion anyway when printing the ruleset, so we merely need
> > to make this accessible outside of plain printf() to stdout.
> 
> Probably the underlying problem is that the monitor code is that not
> delinearing, ie. transforming from netlink to abstract syntax tree
> (ast) before printing?

No, we are talking about different issues (but with a potential common
solution):

Florian searches for a way to "convert" an expression from it's binary
form (a struct expr) into a human readable string (here: "meta
iifname"). We have this "converter" already in very limited form, namely
expr_print(). Eric's patch changes that function to make use of
nft_print(), which effectively allows to define a custom buffer to print
into.

Florian, did I get this right?

Cheers, Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-21 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-03 22:03 [nft PATCH 0/2] libnftables preparation work Eric Leblond
2017-09-03 22:03 ` [nft PATCH 1/2] src: add flags fo nft_ctx_new Eric Leblond
2017-09-03 22:33   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-03 22:45     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-04  7:21       ` Eric Leblond
2017-09-03 22:03 ` [nft PATCH 2/2] src: get rid of printf Eric Leblond
2017-09-03 22:34   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-04  7:45     ` Eric Leblond
2017-09-04  7:55     ` [nft PATCH v2] libnftables preparation work Eric Leblond
2017-09-04  7:55       ` [nft PATCH v2 1/2] src: add flags fo nft_ctx_new Eric Leblond
2017-09-04 20:43         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-04  7:55       ` [nft PATCH v2 2/2] src: get rid of printf Eric Leblond
2017-09-04 20:43         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-04 20:53           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-04 21:23             ` Eric Leblond
2017-09-05 17:33               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-21 15:37             ` Phil Sutter
2017-09-21 15:43               ` Florian Westphal
2017-09-21 15:51                 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-21 16:21                   ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2017-09-21 17:05                     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170921162108.GY30364@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=eric@regit.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).