From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] iptables: change large file support handling Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:14:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20171004141458.GA28637@salvia> References: <201709281059.45061.jbe@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Juergen Borleis Return-path: Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:50421 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbdJDOPH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201709281059.45061.jbe@pengutronix.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Juergen, On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Juergen Borleis wrote: > The configure script handles the "--*-largefile" parameter badly. It > defaults to large file support if not given and always disables largefile > support if given (and it doesn't matter if 'enable' or 'disable' was used) It seems the default behaviour for a while has been to enable largefile by default. Then, someone came in to add this --disable-largefile configure time option, see: commit 967cb7106f0f61cd7b8fbb10bc2451a3f7372a43 Author: Karl Hiramoto Date: Mon May 10 17:50:41 2010 +0200 iptables: optionally disable largefile support So I would just fix --enable-* --disable-*. Would you follow up on this? Let me know, thanks.