From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@nsof.io>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
rbk@nsof.io, Rafael Buchbinder <rafi@rbk.ms>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iptables: support match info fixup after tc_init
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:33:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004143301.GA22316@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918175424.GA17019@salvia>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:54:24PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 01:50:32PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:00:42PM +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > >> Hi Pablo,
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:28:11 +0200 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > + /* Fixes the match info after init. */
> > >> > > + void (*tc_init_fixup)(struct xt_entry_match *match);
> > >> >
> > >> > If this is only broken from tc ipt actions, could you fix this from
> > >> > iproute2/tc instead?
> > >>
> > >> No, this is not iproute2/tc specfic.
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> > >> We named it 'tc_init_fixup' as it occurs just after the TC_INIT
> > >> (iptc_init/ip6tc_init) call.
> > >> If this is confusing, we can rename to 'init_fixup' or 'post_init_fixup'
> > >> or 'iptc_init_fixup'.
> > >>
> > >> This must occur after every load of entries, as the xt_bpf match needs
> > >> a fixup once read from kernel.
> > >>
> > >> The problem lies in the xt_bpf_info_v1 ABI.
> > >> See:
> > >> https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150530909630143&w=2
> > >
> > > I see, can we get a v2 ABI that fixes this? Given this was included
> > > not long time ago, we can quickly deprecate this without this custom
> > > hook to address this.
> >
> > We can perhaps change the kernel module to ignore .fd and do a
> > path lookup for .path directly inside the kernel. That would not
> > require a v2, even.
>
> That sounds very reasonable, so we can just address this as a plain
> fix and pass it on to -stable.
Anyone following up with this?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-17 11:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] xt_bpf: fix handling of pinned objects Shmulik Ladkani
2017-09-17 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iptables: support match info fixup after tc_init Shmulik Ladkani
2017-09-18 16:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-18 17:00 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2017-09-18 17:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-09-18 17:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-09-18 17:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-10-04 14:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-10-04 14:38 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2017-09-18 18:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2017-09-17 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] extensions: xt_bpf: get the pinned ebpf object when match is initialized Shmulik Ladkani
2017-09-18 16:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004143301.GA22316@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafi@rbk.ms \
--cc=rbk@nsof.io \
--cc=shmulik@nsof.io \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).