From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/3] netfilter: remove pf argument from conntrack l4 packet function Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20171024160327.GA12108@salvia> References: <20171011084742.25989-1-fw@strlen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57008 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295AbdJXQDe (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:03:34 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4A2E9772 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FA7DA873 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171011084742.25989-1-fw@strlen.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > We currently pass pf to the packet() function of the l4 trackers, > but this isn't needed -- its only required for the 'log invalid' check > and the l4 protocol is also available in the nf_conn entry. Series applied, thanks.