From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_connlimit: don't store address in the conn nodes Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20171024160504.GC12134@salvia> References: <20171015090034.6314-1-fw@strlen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57544 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295AbdJXQFM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:05:12 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1133AE976C for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:05:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0157ADA7F7 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:05:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171015090034.6314-1-fw@strlen.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:00:34AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Only stored, never read. This is a leftover from commit 7d08487777c8 > ("netfilter: connlimit: use rbtree for per-host conntrack obj storage"), > which added the rbtree node struct that stores the address instead. Applied, thanks.