From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: "Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio" <akp@cohaesio.com>
Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nftables rules not matching after upgrading from 0.7 to 0.8
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:57:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171025175725.GJ19457@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508949114.1154.14.camel@cohaesio.com>
Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio <akp@cohaesio.com> wrote:
> After upgrading to nftables 0.8 (from 0.7) on one of my systems, I've
> experiences several cases where rules that used to work fine with 0.7
> sometimes doesn't match anymore with 0.8 (it's not consistent -
> sometimes the rules do match with 0.8).
>
> The rule chains end with a log statement before rejecting or dropping
> the packets, and I can see in the log that everything is as expected
> and the rules should match. After downgrading to nftables 0.7
> everything works again.
Are those errors restricted to a particular table family, chain or protocol?
At least for ip family all packets will have pkt->tprot_set true,
so I don't see how meta would break there.
> ip filter input
> - [ payload load 1b @ network header + 9 => reg 1 ]
> + [ meta load l4proto => reg 1 ]
>
> and
>
> ip6 filter input
> - [ payload load 1b @ network header + 6 => reg 1 ]
> + [ meta load l4proto => reg 1 ]
>
> for many of the rules. I believe this is intentional and correct by
> itself, so I guess the problem is in the kernel (the system is
> currently running 4.13.8), where "meta l4proto" sometimes isn't what it
> should be.
Weird. We changed the implicit l4 dependencies to meta l4proto because
in ipv6 case this will skip extension headers.
IIRC ipv4 was only changed to keep it more simple.
(also nft_set_pktinfo_ipv4 sets
pkt->tprot_set = true;
pkt->tprot = iph->protocol;
so I fail to see why it should not be identical in all cases).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 16:31 nftables rules not matching after upgrading from 0.7 to 0.8 Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-10-25 17:57 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-10-25 18:20 ` Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-10-25 22:22 ` Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-10-25 22:45 ` Florian Westphal
2017-10-25 23:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-10-26 7:00 ` Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-10-25 23:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-10-26 6:47 ` Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-11-06 16:49 ` Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio
2017-11-07 0:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171025175725.GJ19457@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=akp@cohaesio.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).