From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_hash: fix nft_hash_deactivate Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 19:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20171102180447.28064-1-fw@strlen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Florian Westphal To: Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:60242 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933025AbdKBSEb (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:04:31 -0400 Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jindřich Makovička says: The logical OR looks fishy to me. Shouldn't be && there instead? Link: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal --- net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c index 9c0d5a7ce5f9..fcd51e819d72 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static void *nft_hash_deactivate(const struct net *net, hash = reciprocal_scale(hash, priv->buckets); hlist_for_each_entry(he, &priv->table[hash], node) { if (!memcmp(nft_set_ext_key(&this->ext), &elem->key.val, - set->klen) || + set->klen) && nft_set_elem_active(&he->ext, genmask)) { nft_set_elem_change_active(net, set, &he->ext); return he; -- 2.13.6