From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 21:32:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103152636.9967-3-pablo@netfilter.org>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> +static int __init nf_flow_offload_module_init(void)
> +{
> + struct rhashtable_params params = flow_offload_rhash_params;
> + struct nf_hook_ops flow_offload_hook = {
> + .hook = nf_flow_offload_hook,
> + .pf = NFPROTO_NETDEV,
> + .hooknum = NF_NETDEV_INGRESS,
> + .priority = -100,
Magic number. Should this be documented in nft?
Alternatively we could reject NETDEV_INGRESS base chains from
userspace if prio < 0 to prevent userspace rules from messing
with this flow offlaod infrastructure.
I guess the rationale of using auto-builtin hook is to avoid
forcing users to configure this with nftables rules?
> + rtnl_lock();
> + for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
> + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry) {
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + return -ENOMEM;
This would need error unwinding (Unregistering the already-registered
hooks).
> + err = nf_register_net_hook(&init_net, &entry->ops);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
And here as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 15:26 [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 1/5] netfilter: nf_conntrack: move nf_ct_netns_{get,put}() to core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:30 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:32 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 3/5] netfilter: nf_flow_offload: integration with conntrack Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 19:49 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 4/5] netfilter: nf_tables: flow offload expression Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-04 1:19 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 5/5] netfilter: nft_flow_offload: add ndo hooks for hardware offload Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:56 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-11 12:49 ` Felix Fietkau
2017-11-04 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Florian Fainelli
2017-11-14 0:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).