netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 21:32:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103152636.9967-3-pablo@netfilter.org>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> +static int __init nf_flow_offload_module_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct rhashtable_params params = flow_offload_rhash_params;
> +	struct nf_hook_ops flow_offload_hook = {
> +		.hook		= nf_flow_offload_hook,
> +		.pf		= NFPROTO_NETDEV,
> +		.hooknum	= NF_NETDEV_INGRESS,
> +		.priority	= -100,

Magic number.  Should this be documented in nft?

Alternatively we could reject NETDEV_INGRESS base chains from
userspace if prio < 0 to prevent userspace rules from messing
with this flow offlaod infrastructure.

I guess the rationale of using auto-builtin hook is to avoid
forcing users to configure this with nftables rules?

> +	rtnl_lock();
> +	for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
> +		entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!entry) {
> +			rtnl_unlock();
> +			return -ENOMEM;

This would need error unwinding (Unregistering the already-registered
hooks).

> +		err = nf_register_net_hook(&init_net, &entry->ops);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			return err;

And here as well.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-03 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 15:26 [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 1/5] netfilter: nf_conntrack: move nf_ct_netns_{get,put}() to core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:30   ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:32   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 3/5] netfilter: nf_flow_offload: integration with conntrack Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 19:49   ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 4/5] netfilter: nf_tables: flow offload expression Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-04  1:19   ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 5/5] netfilter: nft_flow_offload: add ndo hooks for hardware offload Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:56   ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-11 12:49   ` Felix Fietkau
2017-11-04  4:49 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Florian Fainelli
2017-11-14  0:52 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).