From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH RFC] libnftables: Make output_fp default to /dev/null
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120124716.GA17684@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120123851.GT32305@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:38:51PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:33:13PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:32:04PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > Hi Phil,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:14:15PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > Ensure output_fp is never NULL which allows to drop all respective
> > > > checks.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > > > ---
> > > > Hi Pablo,
> > > >
> > > > This is how I understood your suggestion to use /dev/null. While
> > > > implementing it though, I had an idea for a much simpler solution,
> > > > namely just rejecting NULL in nft_set_output() and therefore forcing the
> > > > application to deal with opening /dev/null if no output is desired. What
> > > > do you think about that?
> > >
> > > I like your idea of rejecting NULL.
>
> OK, cool.
>
> > BTW, why does nft_set_output() return FILE *? Is there any usecase for
> > this?
>
> It's a quick way to change output_fp and store its old value. Current
> users are nft_run_cmd_from_*().
Oh, I see.
> I could introduce nft_get_output() to make the return value a dedicated
> success/fail indicator if you prefer that, otherwise I'd just make
> nft_set_output() return NULL in error case.
As you prefer. For my usecase, the existing call is just fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 8:06 [nft PATCH 0/2] Review code regarding output_fp Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 8:06 ` [nft PATCH 1/2] Make 'nft export' respect output_fp Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 8:06 ` [nft PATCH 2/2] monitor: Make JSON output " Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 13:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 13:54 ` Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 13:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 13:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 13:58 ` Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 14:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 14:19 ` Phil Sutter
2017-11-16 14:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 19:14 ` [nft PATCH RFC] libnftables: Make output_fp default to /dev/null Phil Sutter
2017-11-20 12:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-20 12:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-20 12:38 ` Phil Sutter
2017-11-20 12:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-11-20 15:54 ` [nft PATCH] libnftables: Ensure output_fp is never NULL Phil Sutter
2017-11-22 12:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-16 13:34 ` [nft PATCH 0/2] Review code regarding output_fp Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171120124716.GA17684@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).