netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 0/5] promote NFPROTO_INET as real family
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:02:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171122140250.14798-1-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)

Hi,

This is a patchset to handle NFPROTO_INET hook registration from the
Netfilter core, as we discussed during the NFWS in Faro, Portugal [1].
>From the hook path, your code just needs to check for state->pf to know
if this either IPv4 or IPv6 traffic, alternatively skb->protocol could
be used for this purpose too.

This is removing a bit of complexity / ad-hoc code for the nf_tables
codebase to handle this family, just to save one single branch in the
packet path. And after this patch, NFPROTO_INET is not a pseudo-family
anymore.

This patchset applies on top of Florian's netfilter: reduce hook sizes in
struct net series.

[1] https://workshop.netfilter.org/2017/wiki/images/4/48/Nf-nfproto-inet.pdf

Pablo Neira Ayuso (5):
  netfilter: add nf_remove_net_hook
  netfilter: pass hook number and family as parameter to nf_find_hook_list()
  netfilter: handle NFPROTO_INET family hook registration from core
  netfilter: nf_tables_inet: don't use multihook infrastructure anymore
  netfilter: nf_tables: remove multihook chains and families

 include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h       |  9 +--
 include/net/netfilter/nf_tables_ipv4.h  |  2 -
 include/net/netfilter/nf_tables_ipv6.h  |  2 -
 net/bridge/netfilter/nf_tables_bridge.c |  1 -
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tables_arp.c      |  1 -
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_tables_ipv4.c     |  4 +-
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_tables_ipv6.c     |  4 +-
 net/netfilter/core.c                    | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c           | 97 +++++++++++++-------------------
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_inet.c          | 65 ++++++++++++++++++----
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_netdev.c        |  3 +-
 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c              |  8 +--
 12 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0


             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22 14:02 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-11-22 14:02 ` [PATCH nf-next 1/5] netfilter: add nf_remove_net_hook Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-22 14:02 ` [PATCH nf-next 2/5] netfilter: pass hook number and family as parameter to nf_find_hook_list() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-22 14:02 ` [PATCH nf-next 3/5] netfilter: handle NFPROTO_INET family hook registration from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-22 14:02 ` [PATCH nf-next 4/5] netfilter: nf_tables_inet: don't use multihook infrastructure anymore Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-22 14:02 ` [PATCH nf-next 5/5] netfilter: nf_tables: remove multihook chains and families Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171122140250.14798-1-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).