From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH RFC] libnftables: Implement JSON output support
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:56:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117185630.GD25722@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117184504.zkeojrwxjsbswymk@salvia>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 07:45:04PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:50:26PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:51:40PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > * There is quite some code-duplication involved given that this
> > > > > introduces an alternative function for almost any function in the
> > > > > affected code path.
> > > >
> > > > You mean, a new callback for each expr/datatype? We should not expose
> > > > bitwise/byteorder and such, it's too low level.
> > >
> > > I'd rather see you map the abstract syntax tree that is represented
> > > through parser_bison.y to your json representation. I think this patch
> > > is mapping the tree that we obtain after the evaluation phase, which
> > > comes with low level expressions such as bitwise/byteorder.
> >
> > I don't get your point here, either: Not sure what this has to do with
> > parser_bison.y - my patch handles output only for now, I didn't bother
> > with input yet. Or am I on the completely wrong track now?
>
> Sorry, I was refering about the input support.
Ah, I see. For input, I did consider using bison BTW, but doubt it will
lead to less code than implementing everything with libjansson. And yes,
this will then be on the same level as parser_bison.y, so what is parsed
will then be fed to cmd_evaluate().
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 11:51 [nft PATCH RFC] libnftables: Implement JSON output support Phil Sutter
2018-01-17 12:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-17 12:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-17 17:52 ` Phil Sutter
2018-01-17 18:45 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-17 18:56 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2018-01-17 18:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-17 19:24 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117185630.GD25722@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).