From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the netfilter-next tree Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:41:25 +1100 Message-ID: <20181016104125.2a299bc5@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/Pz9NZM4HjnQuGcakoiEtXrk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Howells To: Pablo Neira Ayuso , NetFilter Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/Pz9NZM4HjnQuGcakoiEtXrk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c: In function 'set_ect_tcp': net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:58:28: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE' undeclared = (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE'? if ((!(einfo->operation & IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE) || ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:58:28: note: each undeclared identifier is rep= orted only once for each function it appears in net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:60:28: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR' undeclared = (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR'? (!(einfo->operation & IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR) || ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c: In function 'ecn_tg': net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:84:25: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_IP' undeclared (= first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_IP'? if (einfo->operation & IPT_ECN_OP_SET_IP) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_IP net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:88:26: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE' undeclared = (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE'? if (einfo->operation & (IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE | IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:88:47: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR' undeclared = (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR'? if (einfo->operation & (IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE | IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c: In function 'ecn_tg_check': net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:101:25: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_MASK' undeclared (f= irst use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_IP_MASK'? if (einfo->operation & IPT_ECN_OP_MASK) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_IP_MASK net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:107:27: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE' undeclared= (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE'? if ((einfo->operation & (IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE|IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR)) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_ECE net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ECN.c:107:46: error: 'IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR' undeclared= (first use in this function); did you mean 'IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR'? if ((einfo->operation & (IPT_ECN_OP_SET_ECE|IPT_ECN_OP_SET_CWR)) && ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IPT_ECN_OP_MATCH_CWR Caused by commit 25038aaf0cbf ("UAPI: netfilter: Fix symbol collision issues [ver #2]") I used the netfilter-next tree from next-20181015 for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/Pz9NZM4HjnQuGcakoiEtXrk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlvFJaUACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwDEggAn6sCOZxM6kIdtWt1DY1v8e8/G0KXE+ar4SjwcYytEGHzy/H+D2r2lqfB JdJen4sKIaEjTdnWomqkNdxTA05dhrkbOH73TV6Vy9TEjGQ/N6il5036cyxhLJ1E y/SfunckvN5paFyzqC7wyRGcKAAepXWaZLf3ZdYU97PwogTU42aUGPER9Vowd0PX xYWCgBuMs1qOJ9ogvyxXs2DplMXbmTrYZhCTNnWB1EuSfmIeURmroHHM01otId7V wz5jCy5OHupkdWaa9pLvkWb4N5dqV6wplgWuDmDbtrSkrw87DHCsotFFV+9ocRbi OBbD3vw7cSmeO4PYvGdaIv3efTkTAg== =Xf9r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Pz9NZM4HjnQuGcakoiEtXrk--