netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: accept duplicate fragments again
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:42:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617224223.1004-4-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617224223.1004-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>

When fixing the skb leak introduced by the conversion to rbtree, I
forgot about the special case of duplicate fragments. The condition
under the 'insert_error' label isn't effective anymore as
nf_ct_frg6_gather() doesn't override the returned value anymore. So
duplicate fragments now get NF_DROP verdict.

To accept duplicate fragments again, handle them specially as soon as
inet_frag_queue_insert() reports them. Return -EINPROGRESS which will
translate to NF_STOLEN verdict, like any accepted fragment. However,
such packets don't carry any new information and aren't queued, so we
just drop them immediately.

Fixes: a0d56cb911ca ("netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: fix leakage of unqueued fragments")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index 5b3f65e29b6f..8951de8b568f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -265,8 +265,14 @@ static int nf_ct_frag6_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	prev = fq->q.fragments_tail;
 	err = inet_frag_queue_insert(&fq->q, skb, offset, end);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		if (err == IPFRAG_DUP) {
+			/* No error for duplicates, pretend they got queued. */
+			kfree_skb(skb);
+			return -EINPROGRESS;
+		}
 		goto insert_error;
+	}
 
 	if (dev)
 		fq->iif = dev->ifindex;
@@ -304,8 +310,6 @@ static int nf_ct_frag6_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return -EINPROGRESS;
 
 insert_error:
-	if (err == IPFRAG_DUP)
-		goto err;
 	inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
 err:
 	skb_dst_drop(skb);
-- 
2.11.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 22:42 [PATCH 0/3] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-17 22:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: nf_tables: fix module autoload with inet family Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-17 22:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: fix leakage of unqueued fragments Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-17 22:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617224223.1004-4-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).