From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD0AC43613 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0013205C9 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727325AbfFXQYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:24:09 -0400 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc ([151.80.46.58]:51378 "EHLO orbyte.nwl.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbfFXQYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:24:09 -0400 Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hfRlG-0002vh-Vb; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:24:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:24:06 +0200 From: Phil Sutter To: Florian Westphal Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [nft PATCH] files: Move netdev-ingress.nft to /etc/nftables as well Message-ID: <20190624162406.GB9218@orbyte.nwl.cc> Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Florian Westphal , Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190624151238.4869-1-phil@nwl.cc> <20190624151446.2umdf4bzem4h7yqj@breakpoint.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190624151446.2umdf4bzem4h7yqj@breakpoint.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Hi Florian, On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 05:14:46PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Phil Sutter wrote: > > Commit 13535a3b40b62 ("files: restore base table skeletons") moved > > config skeletons back from examples/ to /etc/nftables/ directory, but > > ignored the fact that commit 6c9230e79339c ("nftables: rearrange files > > and examples") added a new file 'netdev-ingress.nft' which is referenced > > from 'all-in-one.nft' as well. > > Right. Do you think we should also add in inet-nat.nft example, > or even replace the ipvX- ones? Having an inet family nat example would be wonderful! Can inet NAT replace IPvX-ones completely or are there any limitations as to what is possible in rules? Cheers, Phil