From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 19:41:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628174125.20739-5-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628174125.20739-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Since v5.1-rc1, some types of packets do not get unreachable reply with the
following iptables setting. Fox example,
$ iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type 8 -j REJECT
$ ping 127.0.0.1 -c 1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
— 127.0.0.1 ping statistics —
1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
We should have got the following reply from command line, but we did not.
From 127.0.0.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Port Unreachable
Yi Zhao reported it and narrowed it down to:
7fc38225363d ("netfilter: reject: skip csum verification for protocols that don't support it"),
This is because nf_ip_checksum still expects pseudo-header protocol type 0 for
packets that are of neither TCP or UDP, and thus ICMP packets are mistakenly
treated as TCP/UDP.
This patch corrects the conditions in nf_ip_checksum and all other places that
still call it with protocol 0.
Fixes: 7fc38225363d ("netfilter: reject: skip csum verification for protocols that don't support it")
Reported-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c | 2 +-
net/netfilter/utils.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
index 9becac953587..71a84a0517f3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_icmpv4_error(struct nf_conn *tmpl,
/* See ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c */
if (state->net->ct.sysctl_checksum &&
state->hook == NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING &&
- nf_ip_checksum(skb, state->hook, dataoff, 0)) {
+ nf_ip_checksum(skb, state->hook, dataoff, IPPROTO_ICMP)) {
icmp_error_log(skb, state, "bad hw icmp checksum");
return -NF_ACCEPT;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
index 84f5c90a7f21..9f3e52ebd3b8 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ int nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!skb_make_writable(skb, hdrlen + sizeof(*inside)))
return 0;
- if (nf_ip_checksum(skb, hooknum, hdrlen, 0))
+ if (nf_ip_checksum(skb, hooknum, hdrlen, IPPROTO_ICMP))
return 0;
inside = (void *)skb->data + hdrlen;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/utils.c b/net/netfilter/utils.c
index 06dc55590441..51b454d8fa9c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/utils.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/utils.c
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ __sum16 nf_ip_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
case CHECKSUM_COMPLETE:
if (hook != NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING && hook != NF_INET_LOCAL_IN)
break;
- if ((protocol == 0 && !csum_fold(skb->csum)) ||
+ if ((protocol != IPPROTO_TCP && protocol != IPPROTO_UDP &&
+ !csum_fold(skb->csum)) ||
!csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
skb->len - dataoff, protocol,
skb->csum)) {
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@ __sum16 nf_ip_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
}
/* fall through */
case CHECKSUM_NONE:
- if (protocol == 0)
+ if (protocol != IPPROTO_TCP && protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
skb->csum = 0;
else
skb->csum = csum_tcpudp_nofold(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 17:41 [PATCH 0/4] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-28 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] ipvs: defer hook registration to avoid leaks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-28 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] ipvs: fix tinfo memory leak in start_sync_thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-28 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: ctnetlink: Fix regression in conntrack entry deletion Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-28 17:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2019-06-28 20:36 ` [PATCH 0/4] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190628174125.20739-5-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).