From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4ACC0650E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E592189E for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726473AbfGCK4D (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:56:03 -0400 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc ([151.80.46.58]:45812 "EHLO orbyte.nwl.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725820AbfGCK4D (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:56:03 -0400 Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hicvg-0005vw-3e; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:56:00 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:56:00 +0200 From: Phil Sutter To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [nft PATCH] files: Move netdev-ingress.nft to /etc/nftables as well Message-ID: <20190703105600.GB31548@orbyte.nwl.cc> Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190624151238.4869-1-phil@nwl.cc> <20190624151446.2umdf4bzem4h7yqj@breakpoint.cc> <20190624162406.GB9218@orbyte.nwl.cc> <20190624164941.dhcm57r35km3azbg@breakpoint.cc> <20190625002404.63o7novb2ett2yoo@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190625002404.63o7novb2ett2yoo@salvia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 02:24:04AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Phil Sutter wrote: > > > > Right. Do you think we should also add in inet-nat.nft example, > > > > or even replace the ipvX- ones? > > > > > > Having an inet family nat example would be wonderful! Can inet NAT > > > replace IPvX-ones completely or are there any limitations as to what is > > > possible in rules? > > > > I'm not aware of any limitations. > > Only limitation is that older kernels do not support NAT for the inet > family. OK, so maybe add inet NAT example but not delete ip/ip6 ones? What is the status regarding my patch, please? I think fixing netdev-ingress.nft location is unrelated to this discussion, right? Cheers, Phil