From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: hujunwei <hujunwei4@huawei.com>
Cc: wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, ja@ssi.bg,
pablo@netfilter.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@huawei.com>,
wangxiaogang3@huawei.com, xuhanbing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: Improve robustness to the ipvs sysctl
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 02:49:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729004958.GA19226@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1997375e-815d-137f-20c9-0829a8587ee9@huawei.com>
hujunwei <hujunwei4@huawei.com> wrote:
[ trimmed CC list ]
> The ipvs module parse the user buffer and save it to sysctl,
> then check if the value is valid. invalid value occurs
> over a period of time.
> Here, I add a variable, struct ctl_table tmp, used to read
> the value from the user buffer, and save only when it is valid.
Does this cause any problems? If so, what are those?
> Fixes: f73181c8288f ("ipvs: add support for sync threads")
> Signed-off-by: Junwei Hu <hujunwei4@huawei.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index 741d91aa4a8d..e78fd05f108b 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -1680,12 +1680,18 @@ proc_do_defense_mode(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> int val = *valp;
> int rc;
>
> - rc = proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> + struct ctl_table tmp = {
> + .data = &val,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = table->mode,
> + };
> +
> + rc = proc_dointvec(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
Wouldn't it be better do use proc_dointvec_minmax and set the
constraints via .extra1,2 in the sysctl knob definition?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-15 14:48 [PATCH net] ipvs: Improve robustness to the ipvs sysctl hujunwei
2019-07-29 0:49 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2019-07-29 14:58 ` hujunwei
2019-07-29 20:20 ` Julian Anastasov
2019-07-30 2:23 ` hujunwei
2019-07-30 7:11 ` [PATCH net v2] " hujunwei
2019-07-30 19:29 ` Julian Anastasov
2019-07-31 15:58 ` hujunwei
2019-07-31 16:03 ` [PATCH net v3] " hujunwei
2019-07-31 17:53 ` Julian Anastasov
2019-08-03 16:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190729004958.GA19226@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hujunwei4@huawei.com \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingfangsen@huawei.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=wangxiaogang3@huawei.com \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
--cc=xuhanbing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).