From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] netfilter: connlabels: prefer static lock initialiser
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:38:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190813183809.4081-8-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813183809.4081-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
seen during boot:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#2, swapper/0/1
lock: nf_connlabels_lock+0x0/0x60, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
Call Trace:
do_raw_spin_lock+0x14e/0x1b0
nf_connlabels_get+0x15/0x40
ct_init_net+0xc4/0x270
ops_init+0x56/0x1c0
register_pernet_operations+0x1c8/0x350
register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x40
tcf_register_action+0x7c/0x1a0
do_one_initcall+0x13d/0x2d9
Problem is that ct action init function can run before
connlabels_init(). Lock has not been initialised yet.
Fix it by using a static initialiser.
Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
index 74b8113f7aeb..d1c6b2a2e7bd 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h>
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.h>
-static spinlock_t nf_connlabels_lock;
+static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_connlabels_lock);
static int replace_u32(u32 *address, u32 mask, u32 new)
{
@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ int nf_conntrack_labels_init(void)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(NF_CT_LABELS_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(long) >= U8_MAX);
- spin_lock_init(&nf_connlabels_lock);
return nf_ct_extend_register(&labels_extend);
}
--
2.11.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 18:38 [PATCH 10/17] netfilter: add missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES) check to header-file Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 11/17] netfilter: add missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) checks to some header-files Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 12/17] netfilter: add missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER) " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 13/17] netfilter: remove "#ifdef __KERNEL__" guards from some headers Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 14/17] kbuild: remove all netfilter headers from header-test blacklist Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 15/17] netfilter: nf_tables: add missing prototypes Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` [PATCH 16/17] netfilter: nf_nat_proto: make tables static Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-08-13 18:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190813183809.4081-8-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).