From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: conntrack: fix infinite loop on rmmod
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514121913.24519-5-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514121913.24519-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
'rmmod nf_conntrack' can hang forever, because the netns exit
gets stuck in nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list():
i_see_dead_people:
busy = 0;
list_for_each_entry(net, net_exit_list, exit_list) {
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(kill_all, net, 0, 0);
if (atomic_read(&net->ct.count) != 0)
busy = 1;
}
if (busy) {
schedule();
goto i_see_dead_people;
}
When nf_ct_iterate_cleanup iterates the conntrack table, all nf_conn
structures can be found twice:
once for the original tuple and once for the conntracks reply tuple.
get_next_corpse() only calls the iterator when the entry is
in original direction -- the idea was to avoid unneeded invocations
of the iterator callback.
When support for clashing entries was added, the assumption that
all nf_conn objects are added twice, once in original, once for reply
tuple no longer holds -- NF_CLASH_BIT entries are only added in
the non-clashing reply direction.
Thus, if at least one NF_CLASH entry is in the list then
nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list() always skips it completely.
During normal netns destruction, this causes a hang of several
seconds, until the gc worker removes the entry (NF_CLASH entries
always have a 1 second timeout).
But in the rmmod case, the gc worker has already been stopped, so
ct.count never becomes 0.
We can fix this in two ways:
1. Add a second test for CLASH_BIT and call iterator for those
entries as well, or:
2. Skip the original tuple direction and use the reply tuple.
2) is simpler, so do that.
Fixes: 6a757c07e51f80ac ("netfilter: conntrack: allow insertion of clashing entries")
Reported-by: Chen Yi <yiche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 0173398f4ced..1d57b95d3481 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2139,8 +2139,19 @@ get_next_corpse(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data),
nf_conntrack_lock(lockp);
if (*bucket < nf_conntrack_htable_size) {
hlist_nulls_for_each_entry(h, n, &nf_conntrack_hash[*bucket], hnnode) {
- if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL)
+ if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(h) != IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
continue;
+ /* All nf_conn objects are added to hash table twice, one
+ * for original direction tuple, once for the reply tuple.
+ *
+ * Exception: In the IPS_NAT_CLASH case, only the reply
+ * tuple is added (the original tuple already existed for
+ * a different object).
+ *
+ * We only need to call the iterator once for each
+ * conntrack, so we just use the 'reply' direction
+ * tuple while iterating.
+ */
ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
if (iter(ct, data))
goto found;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 12:19 [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 12:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: conntrack: avoid gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warning Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: flowtable: Add pending bit for offload work Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 12:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: flowtable: Remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from workqueue Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 12:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2020-05-14 12:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: flowtable: set NF_FLOW_TEARDOWN flag on entry expiration Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 12:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Add missing expired checks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-05-14 20:15 ` [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200514121913.24519-5-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).