From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FBFC433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E34620708 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728116AbgFVMHQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:07:16 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:46806 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728110AbgFVMHQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:07:16 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A03F23D2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC9CDA798 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9D3B5DA73F; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F81EDA8FA; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E619642EF4FB; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:07:07 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: "Alexander A. Klimov" , David Howells , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Alan Stern , Andrea Parri , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E. McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Good idea to rename files in include/uapi/ ? Message-ID: <20200622120707.GA17620@salvia> References: <9feded75-4b45-2821-287b-af00ec5f910f@al2klimov.de> <174102.1592165965@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:37:09PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Monday 2020-06-15 01:34, Alexander A. Klimov wrote: > >> > >> A header file rename is no problem. We even have dummy headers > > Hmm.. if I understand all of you correctly, David, Stefano, Pablo and Al say > > like no, not a good idea, but only you, Jan, say like should be no problem. > > > > Jan, do you have anything like commit messages in mainline or public emails > > from maintainers confirming your opinion? > > I had already given the commit with the (email) message: > > >> Just look at xt_MARK.h, all it does is include xt_mark.h. Cf. > >> 28b949885f80efb87d7cebdcf879c99db12c37bd . Why rename this in 2020 ?