netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	YangYuxi <yx.atom1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: allow connection reuse for unconfirmed conntrack
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 01:17:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703231758.GA4238@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702091829.GB6691@vergenet.net>

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:18:29AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:17:19PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > YangYuxi is reporting that connection reuse
> > is causing one-second delay when SYN hits
> > existing connection in TIME_WAIT state.
> > Such delay was added to give time to expire
> > both the IPVS connection and the corresponding
> > conntrack. This was considered a rare case
> > at that time but it is causing problem for
> > some environments such as Kubernetes.
> > 
> > As nf_conntrack_tcp_packet() can decide to
> > release the conntrack in TIME_WAIT state and
> > to replace it with a fresh NEW conntrack, we
> > can use this to allow rescheduling just by
> > tuning our check: if the conntrack is
> > confirmed we can not schedule it to different
> > real server and the one-second delay still
> > applies but if new conntrack was created,
> > we are free to select new real server without
> > any delays.
> > 
> > YangYuxi lists some of the problem reports:
> > 
> > - One second connection delay in masquerading mode:
> > https://marc.info/?t=151683118100004&r=1&w=2
> > 
> > - IPVS low throughput #70747
> > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/70747
> > 
> > - Apache Bench can fill up ipvs service proxy in seconds #544
> > https://github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/issues/544
> > 
> > - Additional 1s latency in `host -> service IP -> pod`
> > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/90854
> > 
> > Fixes: f719e3754ee2 ("ipvs: drop first packet to redirect conntrack")
> > Co-developed-by: YangYuxi <yx.atom1@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: YangYuxi <yx.atom1@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
> 
> Thanks, this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> 
> Pablo, could you consider applying this to nf-next?

Applied, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01 15:17 [PATCH net-next] ipvs: allow connection reuse for unconfirmed conntrack Julian Anastasov
2020-07-02  9:18 ` Simon Horman
2020-07-03 23:17   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200703231758.GA4238@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yx.atom1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).