Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: fix destination register zeroing
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 19:42:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820174236.10591-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

Following bug was reported via irc:
nft list ruleset
   set knock_candidates_ipv4 {
      type ipv4_addr . inet_service
      size 65535
      elements = { 23.94.139.105 . 123,
                   23.94.139.105 . 123 }
      }
 ..
   udp dport 123 add @knock_candidates_ipv4 { ip saddr . 123 }
   udp dport 123 add @knock_candidates_ipv4 { ip saddr . udp dport }

so for some reason a duplicate entry was created, which should
be impossible.

After some debugging it turned out that the problem is the
immediate value (123) in the second-to-last rule.

Concatenations use 32bit registers, i.e. the elements are 8 bytes
each, not 6 and it turns out the kernel inserted

element 698b5e17 ffff7b00  : 0 [end]
element 698b5e17 00007b00  : 0 [end]

Note the non-zero upper bits of the first element.

It turns out that nft_immediate doesn't zero out the
destination register, but this is needed when the length isn't a
multiple of 4.

Furthermore, the zeroing in nft_payload is also broken.
We can't use [len / 4] = 0 -- if len is a multiple of 4, this results in
a buffer-off-by-one.

We can elide the zeroing in this case, so use a conditional instead of
using [(len -1) / 4].

Fixes: 49499c3e6e18 ("netfilter: nf_tables: switch registers to 32 bit addressing")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++
 net/netfilter/nft_payload.c       | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index bf9491b77d16..224d194ad29d 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ static inline u64 nft_reg_load64(const u32 *sreg)
 static inline void nft_data_copy(u32 *dst, const struct nft_data *src,
 				 unsigned int len)
 {
+	if (len % NFT_REG32_SIZE)
+		dst[len / NFT_REG32_SIZE] = 0;
 	memcpy(dst, src, len);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_payload.c b/net/netfilter/nft_payload.c
index ed7cb9f747f6..7a2e59638499 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_payload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_payload.c
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ void nft_payload_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 	u32 *dest = &regs->data[priv->dreg];
 	int offset;
 
-	dest[priv->len / NFT_REG32_SIZE] = 0;
+	if (priv->len % NFT_REG32_SIZE)
+		dest[priv->len / NFT_REG32_SIZE] = 0;
+
 	switch (priv->base) {
 	case NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER:
 		if (!skb_mac_header_was_set(skb))
-- 
2.26.2


                 reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200820174236.10591-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox