netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 0/4] netfilter: revisit conntrack statistics
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:52:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825225245.8072-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

With recent addition of clash resolution the 'insert_failed' counter has
become confusing.  Depending on wheter clash resolution is successful,
insert_failed increments or both insert_failed and drop increment.

Example (conntrack -S):
[..] insert_failed=15 drop=0 [..] search_restart=268

This means clash resolution worked and the insert_failed increase is harmeless.
In case drop is non-zero, things become murky.

It would be better to have a dedicated counter that only increments when
clash resolution is successful.

This series revisits conntrack statistics.  Counters that do not
indicate an error or reside in fast-paths are removed.

With patched kernel and conntrack tool, output looks similar to this
during a 'clash resolve' stress test:

[..] insert_failed=9 drop=9 [..] search_restart=123 clash_resolve=3675

Florian Westphal (4):
      netfilter: conntrack: do not increment two error counters at same time
      netfilter: conntrack: remove ignore stats
      netfilter: conntrack: add clash resolution stat counter
      netfilter: conntrack: remove unneeded nf_ct_put

 include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h      |    2 -
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h |    3 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c                  |   25 ++++++++-------------
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c               |    5 ++--
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c            |    4 +--
 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-25 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25 22:52 Florian Westphal [this message]
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 1/4] netfilter: conntrack: do not increment two error counters at same time Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 2/4] netfilter: conntrack: remove ignore stats Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 3/4] netfilter: conntrack: add clash resolution stat counter Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 4/4] netfilter: conntrack: remove unneeded nf_ct_put Florian Westphal
2020-08-28 17:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 0/4] netfilter: revisit conntrack statistics Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200825225245.8072-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).