From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6BC433E2 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459852067C for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728362AbgIBQ1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:27:32 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57832 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728386AbgIBQ1Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:27:24 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7360B4FFE01 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64935DA73D for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5A04BDA72F; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBD5DA722; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:27:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F33342EF42A; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:27:18 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric@garver.life Subject: Re: [PATCH nf,v2] netfilter: nf_tables: coalesce multiple notifications into one skbuff Message-ID: <20200902162718.GA17031@salvia> References: <20200902145202.6822-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20200902150443.GE23632@orbyte.nwl.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200902150443.GE23632@orbyte.nwl.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > [...] > > +static void nft_commit_notify(struct net *net, u32 portid) > > +{ > > + struct sk_buff *batch_skb = NULL, *nskb, *skb; > > + unsigned char *data; > > + int len; > > + > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(skb, nskb, &net->nft.notify_list, list) { > > + if (!batch_skb) { > > +new_batch: > > + batch_skb = skb; > > + NFT_CB(batch_skb).report = NFT_CB(skb).report; > > Is this assignment needed? NFT_CB() merely dereferences skb->cb, so > after assigning 'batch_skb = skb', NFT_CB(batch_skb) == NFT_CB(skb), no? That's right, thanks for reviewing.