netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH] nft: Optimize class-based IP prefix matches
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:37:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201006093744.GL29050@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006085621.GA16275@salvia>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:56:21AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Payload expression works on byte-boundaries, leverage this with suitable
> > prefix lengths.
> 
> Interesing. But it kicks in the raw payload expression in nftables.
> 
> # nft list ruleset
> table ip filter {
>         chain INPUT {
>                 type filter hook input priority filter; policy accept;
>                 @nh,96,24 8323072 counter packets 0 bytes 0
>         }
> 
> Would you send a patch for nftables too? There is already approximate
> offset matching in the tree, it should not be too hard to amend.

I had a quick look but it didn't seem trivial to me. It is in
payload_expr_complete() where a template lookup happens based on
expression offset and length which fails due to the unexpected length.
Is this the right place to adjust or am I wrong?

Strictly speaking, this is just a lack of feature in nftables and
nothing breaks due to it. Do you still want to block the iptables change
for it?

Cheers, Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02  9:03 [iptables PATCH] nft: Optimize class-based IP prefix matches Phil Sutter
2020-10-02 11:25 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2020-10-02 11:34   ` Phil Sutter
2020-10-06  8:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-10-06  9:37   ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2020-10-06  9:41     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-10-06 11:48       ` Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201006093744.GL29050@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).