netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: subashab@codeaurora.org
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	pablo@netfilter.org, Sean Tranchetti <stranche@codeaurora.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] x_tables: Properly close read section with read_seqcount_retry
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:20:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116182028.GE22792@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <983d178e6f3aac81d491362ab60db61f@codeaurora.org>

subashab@codeaurora.org <subashab@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately we are seeing it on ARM64 regression systems which
> > > runs a
> > > variety of
> > > usecases so the exact steps are not known.
> > 
> > Ok.  Would you be willing to run some of those with your suggested
> > change to see if that resolves the crashes or is that so rare that this
> > isn't practical?
> 
> I can try that out. Let me know if you have any other suggestions as well
> and I can try that too.
> 
> I assume we cant add locks here as it would be in the packet processing
> path.

Yes.  We can add a synchronize_net() in xt_replace_table if needed
though, before starting to put the references on the old ruleset
This would avoid the free of the jumpstack while skbs are still
in-flight.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-14  2:21 [PATCH nf] x_tables: Properly close read section with read_seqcount_retry Sean Tranchetti
2020-11-14 16:53 ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-16  6:32   ` subashab
2020-11-16 14:18     ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-16 16:26       ` subashab
2020-11-16 17:04         ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-16 17:51           ` subashab
2020-11-16 18:20             ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2020-11-18 12:13               ` Will Deacon
2020-11-18 12:42                 ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-18 12:54                   ` Will Deacon
2020-11-18 13:14                     ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-18 20:39                       ` subashab
2020-11-18 21:10                         ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-20  5:53                           ` subashab
2020-11-20  6:31                             ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-20  9:44                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20  9:53                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20 10:20                                 ` Florian Westphal
2020-11-20 10:47                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-21  1:27                                     ` subashab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116182028.GE22792@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=stranche@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).