From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH] tests: shell: Stabilize nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:11:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201121121154.GA21180@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120193723.GN11766@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:37:23PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > Netlink debug output varies depending on host's endianness and therefore
> > > the test fails on Big Endian machines. Since for the sake of asserting
> > > no needless bitwise expressions in output the actual data values are not
> > > relevant, simply crop the output to just the expression names.
> >
> > Probably we can fix this in libnftnl before we apply patches like this
> > to nft as well?
>
> You're right, ignoring the problems in nft testsuite is pretty
> inconsistent. OTOH this is the first test that breaks iptables testsuite
> on Big Endian while nft testsuite is entirely broken. ;)
Do you think we can fix this from the testsuite site? It would require
to replicate payload files. The snprintf printing is used for
debugging only at this stage. That would fix nft and this specific case.
> I had a look at libnftnl and it seems like even kernel support is needed
> to carry the endianness info from input to output. IMHO data should be
> in a consistent format in netlink messages, but I fear we can't change
> this anymore. I tried to print the data byte-by-byte, but we obviously
> still get problems with any data in host byte order. Do you see an
> easier way to fix this than adding extra info to all expressions
> containing data?
Probably we can make assumptions based on context, such as payload
expression always express things in network byte order, and annotate
that such register stores something in network byteorder. For meta,
assume host byte order. Unless there is an explicit byteorder
expression.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-21 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 17:57 [iptables PATCH] tests: shell: Stabilize nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0 Phil Sutter
2020-11-20 18:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-11-20 19:37 ` Phil Sutter
2020-11-21 12:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2020-11-23 0:13 ` Phil Sutter
2020-11-25 13:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201121121154.GA21180@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).