From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH] tests: shell: Stabilize nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 01:13:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123001321.GQ11766@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201121121154.GA21180@salvia>
Hi Pablo,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:37:23PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > Netlink debug output varies depending on host's endianness and therefore
> > > > the test fails on Big Endian machines. Since for the sake of asserting
> > > > no needless bitwise expressions in output the actual data values are not
> > > > relevant, simply crop the output to just the expression names.
> > >
> > > Probably we can fix this in libnftnl before we apply patches like this
> > > to nft as well?
> >
> > You're right, ignoring the problems in nft testsuite is pretty
> > inconsistent. OTOH this is the first test that breaks iptables testsuite
> > on Big Endian while nft testsuite is entirely broken. ;)
>
> Do you think we can fix this from the testsuite site? It would require
> to replicate payload files. The snprintf printing is used for
> debugging only at this stage. That would fix nft and this specific case.
>
> > I had a look at libnftnl and it seems like even kernel support is needed
> > to carry the endianness info from input to output. IMHO data should be
> > in a consistent format in netlink messages, but I fear we can't change
> > this anymore. I tried to print the data byte-by-byte, but we obviously
> > still get problems with any data in host byte order. Do you see an
> > easier way to fix this than adding extra info to all expressions
> > containing data?
>
> Probably we can make assumptions based on context, such as payload
> expression always express things in network byte order, and annotate
> that such register stores something in network byteorder. For meta,
> assume host byte order. Unless there is an explicit byteorder
> expression.
I like this simple approach, but it's not easy to implement: libnftnl
doesn't know about other expressions, so 'cmp' for instance doesn't know
which expression stored data in reg 1 and therefore can't deduce the
likely endianness of its stored data.
Any idea how to solve that?
Thanks, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 17:57 [iptables PATCH] tests: shell: Stabilize nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0 Phil Sutter
2020-11-20 18:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-11-20 19:37 ` Phil Sutter
2020-11-21 12:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-11-23 0:13 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2020-11-25 13:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201123001321.GQ11766@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).