From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18BBC433C1 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C4A619CD for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233083AbhC3W4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:41 -0400 Received: from mail.netfilter.org ([217.70.188.207]:46542 "EHLO mail.netfilter.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233133AbhC3W4f (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:56:35 -0400 Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 796E063E55; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:56:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:56:30 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Cc: Wan Jiabing , Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kael_w@yeah.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipset: Remove duplicate declaration Message-ID: <20210330225630.GA14620@salvia> References: <20210327025454.917202-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com> <508fa09b-b2a2-b88f-35b1-d6d3d2a24254@netfilter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <508fa09b-b2a2-b88f-35b1-d6d3d2a24254@netfilter.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 09:30:49PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, Wan Jiabing wrote: > > > struct ip_set is declared twice. One is declared at 79th line, > > so remove the duplicate. > > Yes, it's a duplicate. Pablo, could you apply it? Applied, thanks Jozsef.