netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [iptables PATCH v3 2/2] extensions: libxt_conntrack: print xlate status as set
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:58:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331105852.GD17285@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331102934.848126-2-alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com>

Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> At the moment, status_xlate_print function prints statusmask as comma-separated
> sequence of enabled statusmask flags. But if we have inverted conntrack ctstatus
> condition then we have to use more complex expression (if more than one flag enabled)
> because nft not supports syntax like "ct status != expected,assured".
> 
> Examples:
> ! --ctstatus CONFIRMED,ASSURED
> should be translated as
> ct status & (assured|confirmed) == 0
> 
> ! --ctstatus CONFIRMED
> can be translated as
> ct status != confirmed

"! --ctstatus CONFIRMED" means 'true if CONFIRMED bit is not set'
But "ct status != confirmed" means 'true if ct status contains any value
except confirmed.

Example: ct->status has confirmed and assured bits set.
Then:
"! --ctstatus CONFIRMED" won't match (the bit is set).
ct status != confirmed returns true (3 != 1)
ct (status & confirmed) == 0 won't match (the bit is set).


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31 10:29 [iptables PATCH v3 1/2] extensions: libxt_conntrack: print xlate state as set Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2021-03-31 10:29 ` [iptables PATCH v3 2/2] extensions: libxt_conntrack: print xlate status " Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2021-03-31 10:58   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-03-31 13:05     ` Alexander Mikhalitsyn
2021-03-31 11:01 ` [iptables PATCH v3 1/2] extensions: libxt_conntrack: print xlate state " Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210331105852.GD17285@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).