From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/8] netfilter: xt_SECMARK: add new revision to fix structure layout
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 19:47:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210507174739.1850-2-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210507174739.1850-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
This extension breaks when trying to delete rules, add a new revision to
fix this.
Fixes: 5e6874cdb8de ("[SECMARK]: Add xtables SECMARK target")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h | 6 ++
net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h
index 1f2a708413f5..beb2cadba8a9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h
@@ -20,4 +20,10 @@ struct xt_secmark_target_info {
char secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX];
};
+struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 {
+ __u8 mode;
+ char secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX];
+ __u32 secid;
+};
+
#endif /*_XT_SECMARK_H_target */
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
index 75625d13e976..498a0bf6f044 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
@@ -24,10 +24,9 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("ip6t_SECMARK");
static u8 mode;
static unsigned int
-secmark_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
+secmark_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 *info)
{
u32 secmark = 0;
- const struct xt_secmark_target_info *info = par->targinfo;
switch (mode) {
case SECMARK_MODE_SEL:
@@ -41,7 +40,7 @@ secmark_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
return XT_CONTINUE;
}
-static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
+static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 *info)
{
int err;
@@ -73,15 +72,15 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
return 0;
}
-static int secmark_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
+static int
+secmark_tg_check(const char *table, struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 *info)
{
- struct xt_secmark_target_info *info = par->targinfo;
int err;
- if (strcmp(par->table, "mangle") != 0 &&
- strcmp(par->table, "security") != 0) {
+ if (strcmp(table, "mangle") != 0 &&
+ strcmp(table, "security") != 0) {
pr_info_ratelimited("only valid in \'mangle\' or \'security\' table, not \'%s\'\n",
- par->table);
+ table);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -116,25 +115,76 @@ static void secmark_tg_destroy(const struct xt_tgdtor_param *par)
}
}
-static struct xt_target secmark_tg_reg __read_mostly = {
- .name = "SECMARK",
- .revision = 0,
- .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
- .checkentry = secmark_tg_check,
- .destroy = secmark_tg_destroy,
- .target = secmark_tg,
- .targetsize = sizeof(struct xt_secmark_target_info),
- .me = THIS_MODULE,
+static int secmark_tg_check_v0(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
+{
+ struct xt_secmark_target_info *info = par->targinfo;
+ struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 newinfo = {
+ .mode = info->mode,
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ memcpy(newinfo.secctx, info->secctx, SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX);
+
+ ret = secmark_tg_check(par->table, &newinfo);
+ info->secid = newinfo.secid;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned int
+secmark_tg_v0(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
+{
+ const struct xt_secmark_target_info *info = par->targinfo;
+ struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1 newinfo = {
+ .secid = info->secid,
+ };
+
+ return secmark_tg(skb, &newinfo);
+}
+
+static int secmark_tg_check_v1(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
+{
+ return secmark_tg_check(par->table, par->targinfo);
+}
+
+static unsigned int
+secmark_tg_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
+{
+ return secmark_tg(skb, par->targinfo);
+}
+
+static struct xt_target secmark_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {
+ {
+ .name = "SECMARK",
+ .revision = 0,
+ .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
+ .checkentry = secmark_tg_check_v0,
+ .destroy = secmark_tg_destroy,
+ .target = secmark_tg_v0,
+ .targetsize = sizeof(struct xt_secmark_target_info),
+ .me = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "SECMARK",
+ .revision = 1,
+ .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
+ .checkentry = secmark_tg_check_v1,
+ .destroy = secmark_tg_destroy,
+ .target = secmark_tg_v1,
+ .targetsize = sizeof(struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1),
+ .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_secmark_target_info_v1, secid),
+ .me = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
};
static int __init secmark_tg_init(void)
{
- return xt_register_target(&secmark_tg_reg);
+ return xt_register_targets(secmark_tg_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(secmark_tg_reg));
}
static void __exit secmark_tg_exit(void)
{
- xt_unregister_target(&secmark_tg_reg);
+ xt_unregister_targets(secmark_tg_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(secmark_tg_reg));
}
module_init(secmark_tg_init);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 17:47 [PATCH net 0/8] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2021-05-07 23:20 ` [PATCH net 1/8] netfilter: xt_SECMARK: add new revision to fix structure layout patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 2/8] netfilter: arptables: use pernet ops struct during unregister Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 3/8] netfilter: nfnetlink: add a missing rcu_read_unlock() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 4/8] netfilter: nfnetlink_osf: Fix a missing skb_header_pointer() NULL check Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 5/8] netfilter: remove BUG_ON() after skb_header_pointer() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 6/8] netfilter: nftables: Fix a memleak from userdata error path in new objects Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 7/8] netfilter: nftables: avoid overflows in nft_hash_buckets() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-05-07 17:47 ` [PATCH net 8/8] netfilter: nftables: avoid potential overflows on 32bit arches Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210507174739.1850-2-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).