From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CDAC433ED for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 23:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1269B61206 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 23:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230217AbhEMXq2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 19:46:28 -0400 Received: from mail.netfilter.org ([217.70.188.207]:34088 "EHLO mail.netfilter.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230210AbhEMXq1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 19:46:27 -0400 Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D8B46415A for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 01:44:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 01:45:13 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [pablo@netfilter.org: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: flowtable: Remove redundant hw refresh bit] Message-ID: <20210513234513.GA31893@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Forwarding this to netfilter-devel, for the record. This patch is applied to the nf tree. ----- Forwarded message from Pablo Neira Ayuso ----- Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 01:42:07 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Roi Dayan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oz Shlomo , Paul Blakey Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: flowtable: Remove redundant hw refresh bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:50:24PM +0300, Roi Dayan wrote: > Offloading conns could fail for multiple reasons and a hw refresh bit is > set to try to reoffload it in next sw packet. > But it could be in some cases and future points that the hw refresh bit > is not set but a refresh could succeed. > Remove the hw refresh bit and do offload refresh if requested. > There won't be a new work entry if a work is already pending > anyway as there is the hw pending bit. Applied to nf, thanks. ----- End forwarded message -----