From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, ja@ssi.bg, horms@verge.net.au,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next v2 2/4] netfilter: ipvs: remove unneeded output wrappers
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:29:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211012172959.745-3-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012172959.745-1-fw@strlen.de>
After earlier patch we can use ip_vs_out_hook directly.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 62 ++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index 5a5deee3425c..2db033455204 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -1471,56 +1471,6 @@ ip_vs_out_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *stat
return NF_ACCEPT;
}
-/*
- * It is hooked at the NF_INET_FORWARD and NF_INET_LOCAL_IN chain,
- * used only for VS/NAT.
- * Check if packet is reply for established ip_vs_conn.
- */
-static unsigned int
-ip_vs_reply4(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct nf_hook_state *state)
-{
- return ip_vs_out_hook(priv, skb, state);
-}
-
-/*
- * It is hooked at the NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT chain, used only for VS/NAT.
- * Check if packet is reply for established ip_vs_conn.
- */
-static unsigned int
-ip_vs_local_reply4(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct nf_hook_state *state)
-{
- return ip_vs_out_hook(priv, skb, state);
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
-
-/*
- * It is hooked at the NF_INET_FORWARD and NF_INET_LOCAL_IN chain,
- * used only for VS/NAT.
- * Check if packet is reply for established ip_vs_conn.
- */
-static unsigned int
-ip_vs_reply6(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct nf_hook_state *state)
-{
- return ip_vs_out_hook(priv, skb, state);
-}
-
-/*
- * It is hooked at the NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT chain, used only for VS/NAT.
- * Check if packet is reply for established ip_vs_conn.
- */
-static unsigned int
-ip_vs_local_reply6(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
- const struct nf_hook_state *state)
-{
- return ip_vs_out_hook(priv, skb, state);
-}
-
-#endif
-
static unsigned int
ip_vs_try_to_schedule(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
@@ -2243,7 +2193,7 @@ ip_vs_forward_icmp_v6(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {
/* After packet filtering, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_reply4,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
.priority = NF_IP_PRI_NAT_SRC - 2,
@@ -2259,7 +2209,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {
},
/* Before ip_vs_in, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_local_reply4,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT,
.priority = NF_IP_PRI_NAT_DST + 1,
@@ -2281,7 +2231,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {
},
/* After packet filtering, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_reply4,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
.hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
.priority = 100,
@@ -2292,7 +2242,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {
static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops6[] = {
/* After packet filtering, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_reply6,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
.priority = NF_IP6_PRI_NAT_SRC - 2,
@@ -2308,7 +2258,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops6[] = {
},
/* Before ip_vs_in, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_local_reply6,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
.hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT,
.priority = NF_IP6_PRI_NAT_DST + 1,
@@ -2330,7 +2280,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops6[] = {
},
/* After packet filtering, change source only for VS/NAT */
{
- .hook = ip_vs_reply6,
+ .hook = ip_vs_out_hook,
.pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
.hooknum = NF_INET_FORWARD,
.priority = 100,
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-12 17:29 [PATCH nf-next v2 0/4] netfilter: ipvs: remove unneeded hook wrappers Florian Westphal
2021-10-12 17:29 ` [PATCH nf-next v2 1/4] netfilter: ipvs: prepare for hook function reduction Florian Westphal
2021-10-12 17:29 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-10-12 17:29 ` [PATCH nf-next v2 3/4] netfilter: ipvs: remove unneeded input wrappers Florian Westphal
2021-10-12 17:29 ` [PATCH nf-next v2 4/4] netfilter: ipvs: merge ipv4 + ipv6 icmp reply handlers Florian Westphal
2021-10-12 20:38 ` [PATCH nf-next v2 0/4] netfilter: ipvs: remove unneeded hook wrappers Julian Anastasov
2021-10-17 12:17 ` Simon Horman
2021-10-14 21:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211012172959.745-3-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).