From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00464C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAF160EFE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230110AbhJ0WP3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:15:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230097AbhJ0WP3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:15:29 -0400 Received: from bmailout2.hostsharing.net (bmailout2.hostsharing.net [IPv6:2a01:37:3000::53df:4ef0:0]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B865C061570 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [IPv6:2a01:37:1000::53df:5f1c:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1" (verified OK)) by bmailout2.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F22280067AF; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 98FE64C76C; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:13:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:13:01 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] src: Support netdev egress hook Message-ID: <20211027221301.GA5956@wunner.de> References: <20211027101715.47905-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20211027121442.GA20375@wunner.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:29:06PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I'll apply these two patches if you are fine with their state. I'm fine with them. Do you want me to resend them as patches (instead of as attachments)? When running tests I noted an oddity: tests/shell/testcases/0031set_timeout_size_0 fails because 1d2h3m4s10ms is reported as 1d2h3m4s8ms, so 2 msec less. Might be caused by the kernel I tested against (v5.13.12), doesn't seem related to my patches, but odd nevertheless. Thanks, Lukas