From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@nvidia.com>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 2/6] bpf: Remove DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:16:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211030144609.263572-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211030144609.263572-1-memxor@gmail.com>
The only reason to keep it was to initialize list head, but future
commits will introduce more members that need to be set, which is more
convenient to do using designated initializer.
Hence, remove the macro, convert users, and initialize list head inside
register_kfunc_btf_id_set.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/btf.h | 4 ----
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c | 5 ++++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 5 ++++-
6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 203eef993d76..1da108e35042 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -270,10 +270,6 @@ static inline bool bpf_check_mod_kfunc_call(struct kfunc_btf_id_list *klist,
}
#endif
-#define DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET(set, name) \
- struct kfunc_btf_id_set name = { LIST_HEAD_INIT(name.list), (set), \
- THIS_MODULE }
-
extern struct kfunc_btf_id_list bpf_tcp_ca_kfunc_list;
extern struct kfunc_btf_id_list prog_test_kfunc_list;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index be1082270455..1773f91fff10 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6356,6 +6356,7 @@ struct kfunc_btf_id_list {
void register_kfunc_btf_id_set(struct kfunc_btf_id_list *l,
struct kfunc_btf_id_set *s)
{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->list);
mutex_lock(&l->mutex);
list_add(&s->list, &l->list);
mutex_unlock(&l->mutex);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
index ec5550089b4d..280dada5d1ae 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -1169,7 +1169,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, bbr_set_state)
#endif
BTF_SET_END(tcp_bbr_kfunc_ids)
-static DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET(&tcp_bbr_kfunc_ids, tcp_bbr_kfunc_btf_set);
+static struct kfunc_btf_id_set tcp_bbr_kfunc_btf_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &tcp_bbr_kfunc_ids,
+};
static int __init bbr_register(void)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
index 5e9d9c51164c..70384a8040c5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c
@@ -497,7 +497,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, cubictcp_acked)
#endif
BTF_SET_END(tcp_cubic_kfunc_ids)
-static DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET(&tcp_cubic_kfunc_ids, tcp_cubic_kfunc_btf_set);
+static struct kfunc_btf_id_set tcp_cubic_kfunc_btf_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &tcp_cubic_kfunc_ids,
+};
static int __init cubictcp_register(void)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
index 0d7ab3cc7b61..ac2a47eb89d8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
@@ -251,7 +251,10 @@ BTF_ID(func, dctcp_state)
#endif
BTF_SET_END(tcp_dctcp_kfunc_ids)
-static DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET(&tcp_dctcp_kfunc_ids, tcp_dctcp_kfunc_btf_set);
+static struct kfunc_btf_id_set tcp_dctcp_kfunc_btf_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &tcp_dctcp_kfunc_ids,
+};
static int __init dctcp_register(void)
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 5d52ea2768df..a437086e1860 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -93,7 +93,10 @@ BTF_SET_START(bpf_testmod_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
BTF_SET_END(bpf_testmod_kfunc_ids)
-static DEFINE_KFUNC_BTF_ID_SET(&bpf_testmod_kfunc_ids, bpf_testmod_kfunc_btf_set);
+static struct kfunc_btf_id_set bpf_testmod_kfunc_btf_set = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .set = &bpf_testmod_kfunc_ids,
+};
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
{
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-30 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-30 14:46 [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 0/6] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: Refactor bpf_check_mod_kfunc_call Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-30 14:46 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2021-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 3/6] bpf: Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX and PTR_TO_MEM arguments Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 4/6] bpf: Add reference tracking support to kfunc returned PTR_TO_BTF_ID Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 5/6] net: netfilter: Add unstable CT lookup helper for XDP and TC-BPF Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-31 19:10 ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-01 19:49 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-11-02 20:43 ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-05 20:48 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-02 23:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-30 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID selftest Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-02 23:16 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 0/6] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-04 12:55 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-05 20:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-05 21:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-06 18:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-07 15:44 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211030144609.263572-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).