From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>,
dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 5/5] net: prefer nf_ct_put instead of nf_conntrack_put
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 05:03:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220107040326.28038-6-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220107040326.28038-1-fw@strlen.de>
Its the same as nf_conntrack_put(), but without the
need for an indirect call. The downside is a module dependency on
nf_conntrack, but all of these already depend on conntrack anyway.
Cc: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++--
net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 14 ++++++++++----
net/sched/act_ct.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 7a2063abae04..c74933a6039f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static int __nf_ct_resolve_clash(struct sk_buff *skb,
nf_ct_acct_merge(ct, ctinfo, loser_ct);
nf_ct_add_to_dying_list(loser_ct);
- nf_conntrack_put(&loser_ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(loser_ct);
nf_ct_set(skb, ct, ctinfo);
NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, clash_resolve);
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)
/* Invalid: inverse of the return code tells
* the netfilter core what to do */
pr_debug("nf_conntrack_in: Can't track with proto module\n");
- nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
skb->_nfct = 0;
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, invalid);
if (ret == -NF_DROP)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
index 121664e52271..a921c5c00a1b 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ ovs_ct_expect_find(struct net *net, const struct nf_conntrack_zone *zone,
struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
nf_ct_delete(ct, 0, 0);
- nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
}
}
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static bool skb_nfct_cached(struct net *net,
if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
nf_ct_delete(ct, 0, 0);
- nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, 0);
return false;
}
@@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ static int __ovs_ct_lookup(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
/* Associate skb with specified zone. */
if (tmpl) {
- nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
+ ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
nf_conntrack_get(&tmpl->ct_general);
nf_ct_set(skb, tmpl, IP_CT_NEW);
}
@@ -1328,7 +1329,12 @@ int ovs_ct_execute(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
int ovs_ct_clear(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sw_flow_key *key)
{
- nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
+ enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
+ struct nf_conn *ct;
+
+ ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, IP_CT_UNTRACKED);
ovs_ct_fill_key(skb, key, false);
diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index 3fa904cf8f27..9db291b45878 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static bool tcf_ct_skb_nfct_cached(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
nf_ct_kill(ct);
- nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, IP_CT_UNTRACKED);
return false;
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static void tcf_ct_params_free(struct rcu_head *head)
tcf_ct_flow_table_put(params);
if (params->tmpl)
- nf_conntrack_put(¶ms->tmpl->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(params->tmpl);
kfree(params);
}
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct = false;
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
if (ct) {
- nf_conntrack_put(&ct->ct_general);
+ nf_ct_put(ct);
nf_ct_set(skb, NULL, IP_CT_UNTRACKED);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 4:03 [PATCH nf-next 0/5] netfilter: conntrack related cleanups Florian Westphal
2022-01-07 4:03 ` [PATCH nf-next 1/5] netfilter: conntrack: convert to refcount_t api Florian Westphal
2022-01-07 4:03 ` [PATCH nf-next 2/5] netfilter: core: move ip_ct_attach indirection to struct nf_ct_hook Florian Westphal
2022-01-07 4:03 ` [PATCH nf-next 3/5] netfilter: make function op structures const Florian Westphal
2022-01-07 4:03 ` [PATCH nf-next 4/5] netfilter: conntrack: avoid useless indirection during conntrack destruction Florian Westphal
2022-01-07 4:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2022-01-09 22:32 ` [PATCH nf-next 0/5] netfilter: conntrack related cleanups Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220107040326.28038-6-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).