From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@nvidia.com>,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for unstable CT lookup API
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:34:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220111180428.931466-8-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220111180428.931466-1-memxor@gmail.com>
This tests that we return errors as documented, and also that the kfunc
calls work from both XDP and TC hooks.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 4 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c | 48 ++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index f6287132fa89..32d80e77e910 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -48,3 +48,7 @@ CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
+CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
+CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y
+CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=y
+CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e3166a81e989
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "test_bpf_nf.skel.h"
+
+enum {
+ TEST_XDP,
+ TEST_TC_BPF,
+};
+
+void test_bpf_nf_ct(int mode)
+{
+ struct test_bpf_nf *skel;
+ int prog_fd, err, retval;
+
+ skel = test_bpf_nf__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_bpf_nf__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ if (mode == TEST_XDP)
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.nf_xdp_ct_test);
+ else
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.nf_skb_ct_test);
+
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ (__u32 *)&retval, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_bpf_tuple, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for NULL bpf_tuple");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_reserved, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for reserved not set to 0");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_netns_id, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for netns_id < -1");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_einval_len_opts, -EINVAL, "Test EINVAL for len__opts != NF_BPF_CT_OPTS_SZ");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_eproto_l4proto, -EPROTO, "Test EPROTO for l4proto != TCP or UDP");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_enonet_netns_id, -ENONET, "Test ENONET for bad but valid netns_id");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_enoent_lookup, -ENOENT, "Test ENOENT for failed lookup");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_eafnosupport, -EAFNOSUPPORT, "Test EAFNOSUPPORT for invalid len__tuple");
+end:
+ test_bpf_nf__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_bpf_nf(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("xdp-ct"))
+ test_bpf_nf_ct(TEST_XDP);
+ if (test__start_subtest("tc-bpf-ct"))
+ test_bpf_nf_ct(TEST_TC_BPF);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d6d4002ad69c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+#define EAFNOSUPPORT 97
+#define EPROTO 71
+#define ENONET 64
+#define EINVAL 22
+#define ENOENT 2
+
+int test_einval_bpf_tuple = 0;
+int test_einval_reserved = 0;
+int test_einval_netns_id = 0;
+int test_einval_len_opts = 0;
+int test_eproto_l4proto = 0;
+int test_enonet_netns_id = 0;
+int test_enoent_lookup = 0;
+int test_eafnosupport = 0;
+
+struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_lookup(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts *, u32) __ksym;
+struct nf_conn *bpf_skb_ct_lookup(struct __sk_buff *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+ struct bpf_ct_opts *, u32) __ksym;
+void bpf_ct_release(struct nf_conn *) __ksym;
+
+#define nf_ct_test(func, ctx) \
+ ({ \
+ struct bpf_ct_opts opts_def = { .l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP, \
+ .netns_id = -1 }; \
+ struct bpf_sock_tuple bpf_tuple; \
+ struct nf_conn *ct; \
+ __builtin_memset(&bpf_tuple, 0, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4)); \
+ ct = func(ctx, NULL, 0, &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error; \
+ opts_def.reserved[0] = 1; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ opts_def.reserved[0] = 0; \
+ opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP; \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error; \
+ opts_def.netns_id = -2; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ opts_def.netns_id = -1; \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_einval_netns_id = opts_def.error; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def) - 1); \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_einval_len_opts = opts_def.error; \
+ opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_ICMP; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP; \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_eproto_l4proto = opts_def.error; \
+ opts_def.netns_id = 0xf00f; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ opts_def.netns_id = -1; \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_enonet_netns_id = opts_def.error; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def, \
+ sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_enoent_lookup = opts_def.error; \
+ ct = func(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4) - 1, \
+ &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def)); \
+ if (ct) \
+ bpf_ct_release(ct); \
+ else \
+ test_eafnosupport = opts_def.error; \
+ })
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int nf_xdp_ct_test(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ nf_ct_test(bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int nf_skb_ct_test(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ nf_ct_test(bpf_skb_ct_lookup, ctx);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-11 18:04 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/10] bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/10] bpf: Populate kfunc BTF ID sets in struct btf Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-13 22:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-14 4:49 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 5:21 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 6:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-14 7:46 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/10] bpf: Remove check_kfunc_call callback and old kfunc BTF ID API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/10] bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/10] bpf: Add reference tracking support to kfunc Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/10] net/netfilter: Add unstable CT lookup helpers for XDP and TC-BPF Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-01-13 22:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for unstable CT lookup API Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-14 4:51 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add test_verifier support to fixup kfunc call insns Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/10] selftests/bpf: Extend kfunc selftests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-11 18:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220111180428.931466-8-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).