netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@nvidia.com>,
	"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 09/10] selftests/bpf: Extend kfunc selftests
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:09:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220114163953.1455836-10-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220114163953.1455836-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Use the prog_test kfuncs to test the referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID kfunc
support, and PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument passing support. Also
testing the various failure cases for invalid kfunc prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            | 129 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c     |   6 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c     |  52 ++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c  |  75 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 7796a8c747a0..93ba56507240 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -233,6 +233,105 @@ struct sock * noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk)
 	return sk;
 }
 
+struct prog_test_ref_kfunc {
+	int a;
+	int b;
+	struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *next;
+};
+
+static struct prog_test_ref_kfunc prog_test_struct = {
+	.a = 42,
+	.b = 108,
+	.next = &prog_test_struct,
+};
+
+noinline struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
+bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *scalar_ptr)
+{
+	/* randomly return NULL */
+	if (get_jiffies_64() % 2)
+		return NULL;
+	return &prog_test_struct;
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p)
+{
+}
+
+struct prog_test_pass1 {
+	int x0;
+	struct {
+		int x1;
+		struct {
+			int x2;
+			struct {
+				int x3;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+struct prog_test_pass2 {
+	int len;
+	short arr1[4];
+	struct {
+		char arr2[4];
+		unsigned long arr3[8];
+	} x;
+};
+
+struct prog_test_fail1 {
+	void *p;
+	int x;
+};
+
+struct prog_test_fail2 {
+	int x8;
+	struct prog_test_pass1 x;
+};
+
+struct prog_test_fail3 {
+	int len;
+	char arr1[2];
+	char arr2[0];
+};
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1(struct prog_test_pass1 *p)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2(struct prog_test_pass2 *p)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1(struct prog_test_fail1 *p)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2(struct prog_test_fail2 *p)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3(struct prog_test_fail3 *p)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int mem__sz)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1(void *mem, int len)
+{
+}
+
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(u64 *mem, int len)
+{
+}
+
 __diag_pop();
 
 ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_modify_return_test, ERRNO);
@@ -241,8 +340,31 @@ BTF_SET_START(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2)
 BTF_SET_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 
+BTF_SET_START(test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
+BTF_SET_END(test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids)
+
+BTF_SET_START(test_sk_release_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release)
+BTF_SET_END(test_sk_release_kfunc_ids)
+
+BTF_SET_START(test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
+BTF_SET_END(test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids)
+
 static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
 			   u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
 {
@@ -1063,8 +1185,11 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 }
 
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set = {
-	.owner     = THIS_MODULE,
-	.check_set = &test_sk_check_kfunc_ids,
+	.owner        = THIS_MODULE,
+	.check_set    = &test_sk_check_kfunc_ids,
+	.acquire_set  = &test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids,
+	.release_set  = &test_sk_release_kfunc_ids,
+	.ret_null_set = &test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids,
 };
 
 static int __init bpf_prog_test_run_init(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index 7d7445ccc141..b39a4f09aefd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ static void test_main(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test2)");
 	ASSERT_EQ(retval, 3, "test2-retval");
 
+	prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id.prog_fd;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
+				NULL, NULL, (__u32 *)&retval, NULL);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test_ref_btf_id)");
+	ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "test_ref_btf_id-retval");
+
 	kfunc_call_test_lskel__destroy(skel);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index 8a8cf59017aa..5aecbb9fdc68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -1,13 +1,20 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <vmlinux.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
-#include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
 
 extern int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u32 b) __ksym;
 extern __u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, __u32 a, __u64 b,
 				  __u32 c, __u64 d) __ksym;
 
+extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *sp) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx(struct __sk_buff *skb) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1(struct prog_test_pass1 *p) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2(struct prog_test_pass2 *p) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int len) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym;
+
 SEC("tc")
 int kfunc_call_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -44,4 +51,45 @@ int kfunc_call_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *pt;
+	unsigned long s = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	pt = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&s);
+	if (pt) {
+		if (pt->a != 42 || pt->b != 108)
+			ret = -1;
+		bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(pt);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_call_test_pass(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct prog_test_pass1 p1 = {};
+	struct prog_test_pass2 p2 = {};
+	short a = 0;
+	__u64 b = 0;
+	long c = 0;
+	char d = 0;
+	int e = 0;
+
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx(skb);
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1(&p1);
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2(&p2);
+
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&a, sizeof(a));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&b, sizeof(b));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&c, sizeof(c));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&d, sizeof(d));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&e, sizeof(e));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(&b, -1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index d7b74eb28333..829be2b9e08e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -21,6 +21,81 @@
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
 	.result  = ACCEPT,
 },
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT prog_test_fail1 must point to scalar",
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1", 2 },
+	},
+},
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "max struct nesting depth exceeded\narg#0 pointer type STRUCT prog_test_fail2",
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2", 2 },
+	},
+},
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT prog_test_fail3 must point to scalar",
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3", 2 },
+	},
+},
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "arg#0 expected pointer to ctx, but got PTR",
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx", 2 },
+	},
+},
+{
+	"calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "arg#0 pointer type UNKNOWN  must point to scalar",
+	.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+		{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1", 2 },
+	},
+},
 {
 	"calls: basic sanity",
 	.insns = {
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-14 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 16:39 [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 01/10] bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_module Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 02/10] bpf: Populate kfunc BTF ID sets in struct btf Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 03/10] bpf: Remove check_kfunc_call callback and old kfunc BTF ID API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 04/10] bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/10] bpf: Add reference tracking support to kfunc Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 06/10] net/netfilter: Add unstable CT lookup helpers for XDP and TC-BPF Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 07/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for unstable CT lookup API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add test_verifier support to fixup kfunc call insns Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-14 16:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-05-26  1:22   ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 09/10] selftests/bpf: Extend kfunc selftests Benjamin Poirier
2022-05-26  5:15     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-05-26  6:19       ` Benjamin Poirier
2022-01-14 16:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 10/10] selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-01-18 22:52   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-18 20:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers Alexander Egorenkov
2022-02-18 22:20   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-02-19  7:39     ` Alexander Egorenkov
2022-02-19  8:20       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-02-20  1:13       ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220114163953.1455836-10-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).