From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/14] netfilter: conntrack: mark UDP zero checksum as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:36:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209133616.165104-2-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209133616.165104-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
The udp_error function verifies the checksum of incoming UDP packets if
one is set. This has the desirable side effect of setting skb->ip_summed
to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, signalling that this verification need not be
repeated further up the stack.
Conversely, when the UDP checksum is empty, which is perfectly legal (at least
inside IPv4), udp_error previously left no trace that the checksum had been
deemed acceptable.
This was a problem in particular for nf_reject_ipv4, which verifies the
checksum in nf_send_unreach() before sending ICMP_DEST_UNREACH. It makes
no accommodation for zero UDP checksums unless they are already marked
as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
This commit ensures packets with empty UDP checksum are marked as
CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY, which is explicitly recommended in skbuff.h.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
index 3b516cffc779..12f793d8fe0c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
@@ -63,8 +63,10 @@ static bool udp_error(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
/* Packet with no checksum */
- if (!hdr->check)
+ if (!hdr->check) {
+ skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
return false;
+ }
/* Checksum invalid? Ignore.
* We skip checking packets on the outgoing path
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 13:36 [PATCH net-next 00/14] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-02-10 5:50 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] netfilter: conntrack: mark UDP zero checksum as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-02-16 14:10 ` Gal Pressman
2022-02-16 15:28 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-16 16:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-16 18:52 ` Gal Pressman
2022-02-16 19:26 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] netfilter: nfqueue: enable to get skb->priority Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] netfilter: conntrack: make all extensions 8-byte alignned Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] netfilter: conntrack: move extension sizes into core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] netfilter: conntrack: handle ->destroy hook via nat_ops instead Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] netfilter: conntrack: remove extension register api Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] netfilter: conntrack: pptp: use single option structure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] netfilter: exthdr: add support for tcp option removal Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] netfilter: nft_compat: suppress comment match Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] netfilter: ecache: don't use nf_conn spinlock Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] netfilter: cttimeout: use option structure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] netfilter: nft_cmp: optimize comparison for 16-bytes Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] nfqueue: enable to set skb->priority Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-09 13:36 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] netfilter: ctnetlink: use dump structure instead of raw args Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220209133616.165104-2-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).