* [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update
@ 2022-02-20 11:18 Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2022-02-20 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: Florian Westphal, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
memory allocation.
Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
incremented, so add nft_newobj_destroy and use that.
Fixes: d62d0ba97b58 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce stateful object update operation")
Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
v2: can't use nft_obj_destroy, module refcount is not incremented.
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 5fa16990da95..56208e778982 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6909,6 +6909,15 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
return err;
}
+/* nf_tables_updobj does not increment module refcount */
+static void nft_newobj_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_object *obj)
+{
+ if (obj->ops->destroy)
+ obj->ops->destroy(ctx, obj);
+
+ kfree(obj);
+}
+
static void nft_obj_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_object *obj)
{
if (obj->ops->destroy)
@@ -8185,7 +8194,7 @@ static void nft_obj_commit_update(struct nft_trans *trans)
if (obj->ops->update)
obj->ops->update(obj, newobj);
- kfree(newobj);
+ nft_newobj_destroy(&trans->ctx, newobj);
}
static void nft_commit_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
@@ -8976,7 +8985,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ:
if (nft_trans_obj_update(trans)) {
- kfree(nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
+ nft_newobj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
nft_trans_destroy(trans);
} else {
trans->ctx.table->use--;
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update
2022-02-20 11:18 [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update Florian Westphal
@ 2022-02-21 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-21 10:46 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2022-02-21 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]
Hi Florian,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
> The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
>
> This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
> the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
> memory allocation.
>
> Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
> incremented, so add nft_newobj_destroy and use that.
Probably this? .udata and .key is NULL for the update path so kfree
should be fine.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-netfilter-nf_tables-fix-memory-leak-during-stateful-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3459 bytes --]
From 909c4c67deadbc674fcadd081c32c0781eb8e26f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 12:18:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj
update
stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
memory allocation.
Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
incremented, so extend nft_obj_destroy to specify if this is an update.
Fixes: d62d0ba97b58 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce stateful object update operation")
Cc: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 3081c4399f10..7982268d0001 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6909,12 +6909,16 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
return err;
}
-static void nft_obj_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_object *obj)
+static void nft_obj_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_object *obj,
+ bool update)
{
if (obj->ops->destroy)
obj->ops->destroy(ctx, obj);
- module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
+ /* nf_tables_updobj does not increment module refcount */
+ if (!update)
+ module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
+
kfree(obj->key.name);
kfree(obj->udata);
kfree(obj);
@@ -8185,7 +8189,7 @@ static void nft_obj_commit_update(struct nft_trans *trans)
if (obj->ops->update)
obj->ops->update(obj, newobj);
- kfree(newobj);
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, newobj, true);
}
static void nft_commit_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
@@ -8213,7 +8217,7 @@ static void nft_commit_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
nft_trans_elem(trans).priv);
break;
case NFT_MSG_DELOBJ:
- nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj(trans));
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj(trans), false);
break;
case NFT_MSG_DELFLOWTABLE:
if (nft_trans_flowtable_update(trans))
@@ -8853,7 +8857,7 @@ static void nf_tables_abort_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
nft_trans_elem(trans).priv, true);
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ:
- nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj(trans));
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj(trans), false);
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE:
if (nft_trans_flowtable_update(trans))
@@ -8976,7 +8980,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ:
if (nft_trans_obj_update(trans)) {
- kfree(nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans), true);
nft_trans_destroy(trans);
} else {
trans->ctx.table->use--;
@@ -9693,7 +9697,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, ne, &table->objects, list) {
nft_obj_del(obj);
table->use--;
- nft_obj_destroy(&ctx, obj);
+ nft_obj_destroy(&ctx, obj, false);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, nc, &table->chains, list) {
ctx.chain = chain;
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update
2022-02-21 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2022-02-21 10:46 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 10:59 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2022-02-21 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Cc: Florian Westphal, netfilter-devel, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
> > The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
> >
> > This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
> > the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
> > memory allocation.
> >
> > Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
> > incremented, so add nft_newobj_destroy and use that.
>
> Probably this? .udata and .key is NULL for the update path so kfree
> should be fine.
Yes, that works too.
We could also ...
> - module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> + /* nf_tables_updobj does not increment module refcount */
> + if (!update)
> + module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> +
Increment the refcount for update case as well to avoid the special
case?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update
2022-02-21 10:46 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2022-02-21 10:59 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 11:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2022-02-21 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, netfilter-devel, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
> > > The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
> > >
> > > This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
> > > the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
> > > memory allocation.
> > >
> > > Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
> > > incremented, so add nft_newobj_destroy and use that.
> >
> > Probably this? .udata and .key is NULL for the update path so kfree
> > should be fine.
>
> Yes, that works too.
>
> We could also ...
>
> > - module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> > + /* nf_tables_updobj does not increment module refcount */
> > + if (!update)
> > + module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> > +
>
> Increment the refcount for update case as well to avoid the special
> case?
Untested:
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 3081c4399f10..49060f281342 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6553,10 +6553,13 @@ static int nf_tables_updobj(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
struct nft_trans *trans;
int err;
+ if (!try_module_get(type->owner))
+ return -ENOENT;
+
trans = nft_trans_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ,
sizeof(struct nft_trans_obj));
if (!trans)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_trans;
newobj = nft_obj_init(ctx, type, attr);
if (IS_ERR(newobj)) {
@@ -6573,6 +6576,8 @@ static int nf_tables_updobj(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
err_free_trans:
kfree(trans);
+err_trans:
+ module_put(type->owner);
return err;
}
@@ -8185,7 +8190,7 @@ static void nft_obj_commit_update(struct nft_trans *trans)
if (obj->ops->update)
obj->ops->update(obj, newobj);
- kfree(newobj);
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, newobj);
}
static void nft_commit_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
@@ -8976,7 +8981,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ:
if (nft_trans_obj_update(trans)) {
- kfree(nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
+ nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
nft_trans_destroy(trans);
} else {
trans->ctx.table->use--;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update
2022-02-21 10:59 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2022-02-21 11:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2022-02-21 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:59:22AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > stateful objects can be updated from the control plane.
> > > > The transaction logic allocates a temporary object for this purpose.
> > > >
> > > > This object has to be released via nft_obj_destroy, not kfree, since
> > > > the ->init function was called and it can have side effects beyond
> > > > memory allocation.
> > > >
> > > > Unlike normal NEWOBJ path, the objects module refcount isn't
> > > > incremented, so add nft_newobj_destroy and use that.
> > >
> > > Probably this? .udata and .key is NULL for the update path so kfree
> > > should be fine.
> >
> > Yes, that works too.
> >
> > We could also ...
> >
> > > - module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> > > + /* nf_tables_updobj does not increment module refcount */
> > > + if (!update)
> > > + module_put(obj->ops->type->owner);
> > > +
> >
> > Increment the refcount for update case as well to avoid the special
> > case?
Yes, I also though of this one. I prefer this approach indeed to
consolidate this path.
Would you test and submit v3?
Thanks!
> Untested:
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 3081c4399f10..49060f281342 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -6553,10 +6553,13 @@ static int nf_tables_updobj(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> struct nft_trans *trans;
> int err;
>
> + if (!try_module_get(type->owner))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> trans = nft_trans_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ,
> sizeof(struct nft_trans_obj));
> if (!trans)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_trans;
>
> newobj = nft_obj_init(ctx, type, attr);
> if (IS_ERR(newobj)) {
> @@ -6573,6 +6576,8 @@ static int nf_tables_updobj(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>
> err_free_trans:
> kfree(trans);
> +err_trans:
> + module_put(type->owner);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -8185,7 +8190,7 @@ static void nft_obj_commit_update(struct nft_trans *trans)
> if (obj->ops->update)
> obj->ops->update(obj, newobj);
>
> - kfree(newobj);
> + nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, newobj);
> }
>
> static void nft_commit_release(struct nft_trans *trans)
> @@ -8976,7 +8981,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
> break;
> case NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ:
> if (nft_trans_obj_update(trans)) {
> - kfree(nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
> + nft_obj_destroy(&trans->ctx, nft_trans_obj_newobj(trans));
> nft_trans_destroy(trans);
> } else {
> trans->ctx.table->use--;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-20 11:18 [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix memory leak during stateful obj update Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-02-21 10:46 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 10:59 ` Florian Westphal
2022-02-21 11:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).