netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nftables 0/9] nftables: add support for wildcard string as set keys
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:30:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412233023.GF10279@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlYGXSrxnspdBzr5@salvia>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > Yes, but its like this also before my patch, there are several
> > test failures on s390 with nft master.
> 
> Why is the listing being reordered?

No idea, I only saw that this reordering happens, i did not have time to
investigate so far.

> > I will have a look, so far I only checked that my patch
> > series does not cause any additional test failures, and the only
> > reason why the new test fails is the output reorder on s390.
> 
> This is also related to the set description patchset that Phil posted,
> correct?

No, I don't even know what patchset you are talking about.
Is it because of failing pything tests because the debug output has
endianess issues?  If so, not related.

> If you consider that adding remaining features is feasible,
> incrementally should be fine.

Hmm, if there is a technical reason as to why it does not work,
do you think we should hold it back?

It lookes like filter on "{ eth0, ppp* }" works fine as-is.

I thought that something like "eth0-eth42" would also be doable,
by treating both as 128bit bit-string.

Don't see what prevents "ppp* . 80" from working from a technical pov.

So, I *think* its fine to add the pure ifname set support now and
add the rest incrementally.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-09 13:58 [PATCH nftables 0/9] nftables: add support for wildcard string as set keys Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 1/9] evaluate: make byteorder conversion on string base type a no-op Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 2/9] evaluate: keep prefix expression length Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 3/9] segtree: split prefix and range creation to a helper function Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 4/9] evaluate: string prefix expression must retain original length Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 5/9] src: make interval sets work with string datatypes Florian Westphal
2022-04-12 23:46   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 6/9] segtree: add string "range" reversal support Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 7/9] tests: add testcases for interface names in sets Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 8/9] segtree: use correct byte order for 'element get' Florian Westphal
2022-04-09 13:58 ` [PATCH nftables 9/9] segtree: add support for get element with sets that contain ifnames Florian Westphal
2022-04-12 22:17 ` [PATCH nftables 0/9] nftables: add support for wildcard string as set keys Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-12 22:43   ` Florian Westphal
2022-04-12 23:08     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-12 23:30       ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2022-04-12 23:41         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-13  0:02           ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220412233023.GF10279@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).