netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/11] netfilter: nf_conncount: reduce unnecessary GC
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 00:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519220206.722153-3-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519220206.722153-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>

Currently nf_conncount can trigger garbage collection (GC)
at multiple places. Each GC process takes a spin_lock_bh
to traverse the nf_conncount_list. We found that when testing
port scanning use two parallel nmap, because the number of
connection increase fast, the nf_conncount_count and its
subsequent call to __nf_conncount_add take too much time,
causing several CPU lockup. This happens when user set the
conntrack limit to +20,000, because the larger the limit,
the longer the list that GC has to traverse.

The patch mitigate the performance issue by avoiding unnecessary
GC with a timestamp. Whenever nf_conncount has done a GC,
a timestamp is updated, and beforce the next time GC is
triggered, we make sure it's more than a jiffies.
By doin this we can greatly reduce the CPU cycles and
avoid the softirq lockup.

To reproduce it in OVS,
$ ovs-appctl dpctl/ct-set-limits zone=1,limit=20000
$ ovs-appctl dpctl/ct-get-limits

At another machine, runs two nmap
$ nmap -p1- <IP>
$ nmap -p1- <IP>

Signed-off-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yifeng Sun <pkusunyifeng@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count.h |  1 +
 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c               | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count.h
index 9645b47fa7e4..e227d997fc71 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct nf_conncount_data;
 
 struct nf_conncount_list {
 	spinlock_t list_lock;
+	u32 last_gc;		/* jiffies at most recent gc */
 	struct list_head head;	/* connections with the same filtering key */
 	unsigned int count;	/* length of list */
 };
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
index 82f36beb2e76..5d8ed6c90b7e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ static int __nf_conncount_add(struct net *net,
 	struct nf_conn *found_ct;
 	unsigned int collect = 0;
 
+	if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies((unsigned long)list->last_gc))
+		goto add_new_node;
+
 	/* check the saved connections */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, conn_n, &list->head, node) {
 		if (collect > CONNCOUNT_GC_MAX_NODES)
@@ -177,6 +180,7 @@ static int __nf_conncount_add(struct net *net,
 		nf_ct_put(found_ct);
 	}
 
+add_new_node:
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(list->count > INT_MAX))
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
@@ -190,6 +194,7 @@ static int __nf_conncount_add(struct net *net,
 	conn->jiffies32 = (u32)jiffies;
 	list_add_tail(&conn->node, &list->head);
 	list->count++;
+	list->last_gc = (u32)jiffies;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -214,6 +219,7 @@ void nf_conncount_list_init(struct nf_conncount_list *list)
 	spin_lock_init(&list->list_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list->head);
 	list->count = 0;
+	list->last_gc = (u32)jiffies;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conncount_list_init);
 
@@ -227,6 +233,10 @@ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *net,
 	unsigned int collected = 0;
 	bool ret = false;
 
+	/* don't bother if we just did GC */
+	if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies((unsigned long)READ_ONCE(list->last_gc)))
+		return false;
+
 	/* don't bother if other cpu is already doing GC */
 	if (!spin_trylock(&list->list_lock))
 		return false;
@@ -258,6 +268,7 @@ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *net,
 
 	if (!list->count)
 		ret = true;
+	list->last_gc = (u32)jiffies;
 	spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 22:01 [PATCH net-next 00/11] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] netfilter: Use l3mdev flow key when re-routing mangled packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20  5:00   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-05-19 22:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] netfilter: conntrack: remove pr_debug callsites from tcp tracker Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix up for "netfilter: conntrack: remove unconfirmed list" Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net/sched: act_ct: set 'net' pointer when creating new nf_flow_table Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] netfilter: nf_flow_table: count and limit hw offloaded entries Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 23:11   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20  4:55     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20  7:44     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20 17:56       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20 22:17         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20 23:16           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] netfilter: nf_flow_table: count pending offload workqueue tasks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] netfilter: nfnetlink: fix warn in nfnetlink_unbind Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] netfilter: conntrack: re-fetch conntrack after insertion Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] netfilter: cttimeout: fix slab-out-of-bounds read in cttimeout_net_exit Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netfilter: nf_tables: set element extended ACK reporting support Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220519220206.722153-3-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).