From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/11] netfilter: conntrack: remove pr_debug callsites from tcp tracker
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 00:01:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519220206.722153-4-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519220206.722153-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
They are either obsolete or useless.
Those in the normal processing path cannot be enabled on a production
system; they generate too much noise.
One pr_debug call resides in an error path and does provide useful info,
merge it with the existing nf_log_invalid().
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c | 52 ++------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
index 204a5cdff5b1..a63b51dceaf2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
@@ -485,7 +485,6 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(struct nf_conn *ct,
struct nf_tcp_net *tn = nf_tcp_pernet(net);
struct ip_ct_tcp_state *sender = &state->seen[dir];
struct ip_ct_tcp_state *receiver = &state->seen[!dir];
- const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
__u32 seq, ack, sack, end, win, swin;
u16 win_raw;
s32 receiver_offset;
@@ -508,18 +507,6 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(struct nf_conn *ct,
ack -= receiver_offset;
sack -= receiver_offset;
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: START\n");
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: ");
- nf_ct_dump_tuple(tuple);
- pr_debug("seq=%u ack=%u+(%d) sack=%u+(%d) win=%u end=%u\n",
- seq, ack, receiver_offset, sack, receiver_offset, win, end);
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: sender end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i "
- "receiver end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i\n",
- sender->td_end, sender->td_maxend, sender->td_maxwin,
- sender->td_scale,
- receiver->td_end, receiver->td_maxend, receiver->td_maxwin,
- receiver->td_scale);
-
if (sender->td_maxwin == 0) {
/*
* Initialize sender data.
@@ -597,27 +584,10 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(struct nf_conn *ct,
*/
seq = end = sender->td_end;
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: ");
- nf_ct_dump_tuple(tuple);
- pr_debug("seq=%u ack=%u+(%d) sack=%u+(%d) win=%u end=%u\n",
- seq, ack, receiver_offset, sack, receiver_offset, win, end);
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: sender end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i "
- "receiver end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i\n",
- sender->td_end, sender->td_maxend, sender->td_maxwin,
- sender->td_scale,
- receiver->td_end, receiver->td_maxend, receiver->td_maxwin,
- receiver->td_scale);
-
/* Is the ending sequence in the receive window (if available)? */
in_recv_win = !receiver->td_maxwin ||
after(end, sender->td_end - receiver->td_maxwin - 1);
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: I=%i II=%i III=%i IV=%i\n",
- before(seq, sender->td_maxend + 1),
- (in_recv_win ? 1 : 0),
- before(sack, receiver->td_end + 1),
- after(sack, receiver->td_end - MAXACKWINDOW(sender) - 1));
-
if (before(seq, sender->td_maxend + 1) &&
in_recv_win &&
before(sack, receiver->td_end + 1) &&
@@ -698,11 +668,6 @@ static bool tcp_in_window(struct nf_conn *ct,
}
}
- pr_debug("tcp_in_window: res=%u sender end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u "
- "receiver end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u\n",
- res, sender->td_end, sender->td_maxend, sender->td_maxwin,
- receiver->td_end, receiver->td_maxend, receiver->td_maxwin);
-
return res;
}
@@ -772,8 +737,6 @@ static noinline bool tcp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
enum tcp_conntrack new_state;
struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
const struct nf_tcp_net *tn = nf_tcp_pernet(net);
- const struct ip_ct_tcp_state *sender = &ct->proto.tcp.seen[0];
- const struct ip_ct_tcp_state *receiver = &ct->proto.tcp.seen[1];
/* Don't need lock here: this conntrack not in circulation yet */
new_state = tcp_conntracks[0][get_conntrack_index(th)][TCP_CONNTRACK_NONE];
@@ -826,14 +789,6 @@ static noinline bool tcp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
/* tcp_packet will set them */
ct->proto.tcp.last_index = TCP_NONE_SET;
-
- pr_debug("%s: sender end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i "
- "receiver end=%u maxend=%u maxwin=%u scale=%i\n",
- __func__,
- sender->td_end, sender->td_maxend, sender->td_maxwin,
- sender->td_scale,
- receiver->td_end, receiver->td_maxend, receiver->td_maxwin,
- receiver->td_scale);
return true;
}
@@ -1032,10 +987,11 @@ int nf_conntrack_tcp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
}
/* Invalid packet */
- pr_debug("nf_ct_tcp: Invalid dir=%i index=%u ostate=%u\n",
- dir, get_conntrack_index(th), old_state);
spin_unlock_bh(&ct->lock);
- nf_ct_l4proto_log_invalid(skb, ct, state, "invalid state");
+ nf_ct_l4proto_log_invalid(skb, ct, state,
+ "packet (index %d) in dir %d invalid, state %s",
+ index, dir,
+ tcp_conntrack_names[old_state]);
return -NF_ACCEPT;
case TCP_CONNTRACK_TIME_WAIT:
/* RFC5961 compliance cause stack to send "challenge-ACK"
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 22:01 [PATCH net-next 00/11] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] netfilter: Use l3mdev flow key when re-routing mangled packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20 5:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] netfilter: nf_conncount: reduce unnecessary GC Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-05-19 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix up for "netfilter: conntrack: remove unconfirmed list" Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net/sched: act_ct: set 'net' pointer when creating new nf_flow_table Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] netfilter: nf_flow_table: count and limit hw offloaded entries Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 23:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20 4:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20 7:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20 17:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-20 22:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-20 23:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] netfilter: nf_flow_table: count pending offload workqueue tasks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] netfilter: nfnetlink: fix warn in nfnetlink_unbind Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] netfilter: conntrack: re-fetch conntrack after insertion Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] netfilter: cttimeout: fix slab-out-of-bounds read in cttimeout_net_exit Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-05-19 22:02 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netfilter: nf_tables: set element extended ACK reporting support Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519220206.722153-4-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).