From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash due to confirmed bit load reordering
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 09:19:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707081949.GA4057@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706145004.22355-1-fw@strlen.de>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Kajetan Puchalski reports crash on ARM, with backtrace of:
>
> __nf_ct_delete_from_lists
> nf_ct_delete
> early_drop
> __nf_conntrack_alloc
>
> Unlike atomic_inc_not_zero, refcount_inc_not_zero is not a full barrier.
> conntrack uses SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, i.e. it is possible that a 'newly'
> allocated object is still in use on another CPU:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> encounter 'ct' during hlist walk
> delete_from_lists
> refcount drops to 0
> kmem_cache_free(ct);
> __nf_conntrack_alloc() // returns same object
> refcount_inc_not_zero(ct); /* might fail */
>
> /* If set, ct is public/in the hash table */
> test_bit(IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT, &ct->status);
>
> In case CPU1 already set refcount back to 1, refcount_inc_not_zero()
> will succeed.
>
> The expected possibilities for a CPU that obtained the object 'ct'
> (but no reference so far) are:
>
> 1. refcount_inc_not_zero() fails. CPU2 ignores the object and moves to
> the next entry in the list. This happens for objects that are about
> to be free'd, that have been free'd, or that have been reallocated
> by __nf_conntrack_alloc(), but where the refcount has not been
> increased back to 1 yet.
>
> 2. refcount_inc_not_zero() succeeds. CPU2 checks the CONFIRMED bit
> in ct->status. If set, the object is public/in the table.
>
> If not, the object must be skipped; CPU2 calls nf_ct_put() to
> un-do the refcount increment and moves to the next object.
>
> Parallel deletion from the hlists is prevented by a
> 'test_and_set_bit(IPS_DYING_BIT, &ct->status);' check, i.e. only one
> cpu will do the unlink, the other one will only drop its reference count.
>
> Because refcount_inc_not_zero is not a full barrier, CPU2 may try to
> delete an object that is not on any list:
>
> 1. refcount_inc_not_zero() successful (refcount inited to 1 on other CPU)
> 2. CONFIRMED test also successful (load was reordered or zeroing
> of ct->status not yet visible)
> 3. delete_from_lists unlinks entry not on the hlist, because
> IPS_DYING_BIT is 0 (already cleared).
>
> 2) is already wrong: CPU2 will handle a partially initited object
> that is supposed to be private to CPU1.
>
> Add needed barriers when refcount_inc_not_zero() is successful.
>
> It also inserts a smp_wmb() before the refcount is set to 1 during
> allocation.
>
> Because other CPU might still 'see' the object, refcount_set(1)
> "resurrects" the object, so we need to make sure that other CPUs will
> also observe the right contents. In particular, the CONFIRMED bit test
> must only pass once the object is fully initialised and either in the
> hash or about to be inserted (with locks held to delay possible unlink from
> early_drop or gc worker).
>
> I did not change flow_offload_alloc(), as far as I can see it should call
> refcount_inc(), not refcount_inc_not_zero(): the ct object is attached to
> the skb so its refcount should be >= 1 in all cases.
>
> v2: prefer smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep to smp_rmb (Will Deacon).
> v3: keep smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep close to refcount_inc_not_zero call
> add comment in nf_conntrack_netlink, no control dependency there
> due to locks.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Reported-by: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>
> Diagnosed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 719774377622 ("netfilter: conntrack: convert to refcount_t api")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 1 +
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 11:11 [Regression] stress-ng udp-flood causes kernel panic on Ampere Altra Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-01 11:42 ` [Regression] stress-ng udp-flood causes kernel panic on Ampere Altra #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-01 20:01 ` [Regression] stress-ng udp-flood causes kernel panic on Ampere Altra Florian Westphal
2022-07-02 11:08 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-02 11:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-07-02 20:56 ` Florian Westphal
2022-07-04 9:22 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-04 10:53 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-05 10:53 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-05 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 11:24 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 15:29 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-06 10:39 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-06 12:02 ` Florian Westphal
2022-07-06 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-06 12:22 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-06 12:40 ` Florian Westphal
2022-07-06 14:50 ` [PATCH nf v3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash due to confirmed bit load reordering Florian Westphal
2022-07-07 8:19 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2022-07-07 18:59 ` Florian Westphal
2022-07-07 10:17 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-11 16:34 ` Kajetan Puchalski
2022-07-06 14:00 ` [Regression] stress-ng udp-flood causes kernel panic on Ampere Altra Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707081949.GA4057@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kajetan.puchalski@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).